Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Yu Hsiou Hsu will face off in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.67
Yu Hsiou Hsu -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Yu Hsiou Hsu
This will be the 4th time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Yu Hsiou Hsu fight against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Hsiou Hsu (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Hsiou Hsu won 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(2) in the 1st round in the Suzhou Challenger back in October 2025.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
26 - 28win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after defeating Hyeon Chung 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Chung (6-3 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 62 points vs Chung’s 40. Chak was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong bagged 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 62% of his first serves in, winning 64% (18/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. The broke Chung 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (158-128). 17-17 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall126-89 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Chak has a composed 26-28 win-loss record in 2025, 17-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Yu Hsiou Hsu
42 - 27win/loss
219
158
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-31 | 39-25 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-30 | 38-25 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-21 | 30-15 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-24 | 47-18 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 49-16 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 229, Hsiou Hsu reached the 2nd round after defeating Duje Ajdukovic 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Yu had a good straight sets win against Ajdukovic (6-3 6-4). During the match Hsiou Hsu scored 63 points vs Ajdukovic’s 55. Hsiou Hsu was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Hsiou Hsu struck 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Yu Hsiou Hsu was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chinese was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Ajdukovic 3 times.
Hsiou Hsu’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Timaru and the Chicago Challenger.
Hsiou Hsu has an aggregate 42-27 win-loss record in 2025, 39-23 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023 and 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Hsiou Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 62-40 | 63-55 |
| Total Points | 102 | 118 |
| Winners | 18 | 27 |
| %Winners | 29% | 43% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Hsiou Hsu played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Hsiou Hsu have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 2 games less than Hsiou Hsu. Lam Coleman Wong scored 18 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese scored 27 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Hsiou Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 37/68 |
| %1st in | 62% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 18/28 | 27/37 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 3 aces . Hsiou Hsu managed to score 4 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 64% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Hsiou Hsu won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Hsiou Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 3/3 |
| % Converted | 75% | 100% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Yu broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Chung | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-40 | 62-40 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hsiou Hsu | |||
| R1 Ajdukovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-55 | 63-55 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/68 | 37/68 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Woobin ShinShin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Philip SekulicSekulic (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Uisung ParkPark (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Kokoro IsomuraIsomura – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (5-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Renta TokudaTokuda (5-7 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Hynek BartonBarton (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Sanhui ShinShin (7-60 6-0) – See score progression
- Finn Reynolds/James WattReynolds/James Watt – Pruchya Isarow/Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaIsarow/Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Henrique RochaRocha (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – James DuckworthDuckworth (1-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Hyeon ChungChung (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Hynek BartonBarton (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction