Oliver Crawford and Kasidit Samrej will square off in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Oliver Crawford who should win in 2 sets.
Oliver Crawford -> 1.31
Kasidit Samrej -> 3.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Oliver Crawford vs. Kasidit Samrej
There is no head to head record between Oliver Crawford and Kasidit Samrej since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Oliver Crawford
61 - 23win/loss
192
183
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64-27 | 47-17 | 9-4 | 1-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-22 | 9-5 | 18-16 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-27 | 17-9 | 43-17 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-25 | 14-8 | 38-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 52-23 | 23-11 | 29-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Henrique Rocha 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Crawford had a good straight sets win against Rocha (6-1 6-4). During the match, Crawford scored 59 points vs Rocha’s 43. Oliver was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Crawford scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Oliver Crawford conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Crawford put 57% of his first serves in, winning 88% (28/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Rocha 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Crawford has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 69% of his matches (323-148). 45-14 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Crawford has an aggregate 138-59 match record in the last years on hard.
Oliver’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Chennai,M15 Zahra,M15 Villena,M25 Luan,M25 Shenzhen,M25 Bengaluru,M25 Sabadell and the Zhangjiagang Challenger.
The American has an overall 61-23 win-loss record in 2025, 45-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Oliver has never competed in this tournament before.
Kasidit Samrej
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-31 | 28-26 | 0-0 | 19-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-23 | 34-19 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-16 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 408, Samrej reached the 2nd round after beating Duckhee Lee 6-1 6-3, Takuya Kumasaka 6-2 6-1 and Yuki Mochizuki 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kasidit had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (6-4 6-3). During the match Samrej scored 62 points vs Mochizuki’s 46. Kasidit was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Samrej bagged 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Kasidit Samrej was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Samrej broke Mochizuki 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Thai’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Maanshan and M15 Singapore.
Samrej has a composed 45-27 win-loss record in 2025, 27-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Crawford | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 50 |
| Pts | 59-43 | 190-126 |
| Total Points | 102 | 316 |
| Winners | 28 | 69 |
| %Winners | 47% | 36% |
Crawford played 1 match while Samrej competed in 3 matches. Samrej started his run from the qualifications while Crawford had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Crawford has played 4 set(s) less than Samrej (2 vs 6). Therefore, Crawford played 33 games less than Samrej. Oliver scored 28 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Kasidit made 69 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Crawford | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 32/56 | 94/151 |
| %1st in | 57% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 69/94 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 34/57 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Crawford recorded 1 ace . Samrej also managed to score 9 aces (3 per match). Crawford won 88% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Samrej won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Crawford | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 14 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 14/25 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Oliver broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Crawford was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Thai broke his opponents 14 times with a 56% conversion rate. Samrej conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Crawford | |||
| R1 Rocha | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 59-43 | 59-43 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 32/56 | 32/56 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Samrej | |||||
| Q1 Hee Lee | Q3 Kumasaka | R1 Mochizuki | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 19 | 50 | |
| pts | 65-38 | 63-42 | 62-46 | 190-126 | |
| Total points | 103 | 105 | 108 | 316 | |
| Winners | 21 | 23 | 25 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 37% | 40% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 34/58 | 32/45 | 94/151 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 71% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 23/34 | 25/32 | 69/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 68% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 13/24 | 9/13 | 34/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 54% | 69% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/10 | 4/6 | 14/25 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 50% | 67% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2/3 | 1/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | 50% | 184% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Uisung ParkPark (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Renta TokudaTokuda (5-7 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Sanhui ShinShin (7-60 6-0) – See score progression
- Kokoro IsomuraIsomura – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (5-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Philip SekulicSekulic (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Hynek BartonBarton (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Woobin ShinShin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – James DuckworthDuckworth (1-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Hyeon ChungChung (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Henrique RochaRocha (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Philip SekulicSekulic (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Renta TokudaTokuda (5-7 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Sanhui ShinShin (7-6(0) 6-0) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Hynek BartonBarton (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Uisung ParkPark (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction