Samir Banerjee and Cannon Kingsley will face off in the qualifications of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Samir Banerjee who should win in 3 sets.
Samir Banerjee -> 1.444
Cannon Kingsley -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Samir Banerjee vs. Cannon Kingsley
There is no head to head record between Samir Banerjee and Cannon Kingsley since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Samir Banerjee
26 - 8win/loss
354
347
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-10 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 18-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-12 | 12-6 | 5-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-11 | 4-9 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-6 | 9-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 375 (career-high), Banerjee reached the qualifications after defeating Keegan Rice 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Samir had a good straight sets win against Rice (6-3 7-5). During the match, Banerjee scored 76 points vs Rice’s 59. The American was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Banerjee recorded 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Samir Banerjee was extremely effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Samir broke Rice 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Banerjee has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (72-40). 18-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Banerjee has a composed30-7 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Dallas and M25 Trelew.
The American has a composed 26-8 win-loss record in 2025, 18-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Cannon Kingsley
22 - 21win/loss
542
404
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-24 | 5-8 | 9-7 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-18 | 16-12 | 3-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-17 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 7-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-10 | 13-5 | 2-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 523, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Andrew Delgado 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Delgado (6-3 6-2). During the match Kingsley scored 72 points vs Delgado’s 47. Cannon was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Kingsley struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Cannon Kingsley was pretty effective on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kingsley broke Delgado 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Naples.
Kingsley has a compiled 22-21 win-loss record in 2025, 8-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Banerjee | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 |
| Pts | 76-59 | 72-47 |
| Total Points | 135 | 119 |
| Winners | 27 | 28 |
| %Winners | 36% | 39% |
Both Banerjee and Kingsley played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Banerjee and Kingsley have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Banerjee played 4 games more than Kingsley. Banerjee scored 27 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 28 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Banerjee | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 32/62 | 32/46 |
| %1st in | 52% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 28/32 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 18/30 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 64% |
Banerjee made 7 aces . Kingsley fired 3 aces . Banerjee won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Kingsley won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Banerjee | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 25% | 27% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Banerjee broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Samir surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Kingsley broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Kingsley was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Banerjee | |||
| Q1 Rice | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-59 | 76-59 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 32/62 | 32/62 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kingsley | |||
| Q1 Delgado | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 72-47 | 72-47 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/46 | 32/46 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – Joshua SheehySheehy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arda AzkaraAzkara – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction