George Loffhagen and Federico Cina will play each other in the semifinal of the Hamburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Cina who should win in 3 sets.
Federico Cina -> 1.75
George Loffhagen -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head George Loffhagen vs. Federico Cina
There is no head to head record between George Loffhagen and Federico Cina since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
George Loffhagen
49 - 15win/loss
208
200
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 50-18 | 27-8 | 0-0 | 20-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-12 | 14-6 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-15 | 20-6 | 4-2 | 9-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-7 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-17 | 9-4 | 12-11 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 215, Loffhagen reached the semifinal after beating Marko Topo 6-7(10) 7-5 6-1, Daniil Glinka w/o and Henri Squire 6-4 7-6(5).
In the quarter, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Squire (6-4 7-65). During the match, Loffhagen scored 65 points vs Squire’s 53. George was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Loffhagen scored 17 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, George Loffhagen was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (29/36) of his 1st serve and 77% (17/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. George was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Squire twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Loffhagen has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 54% of the points he played.
Loffhagen has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 65% of his matches (201-110). 19-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Loffhagen has an overall51-21 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Segovia Challenger where he defeated Nicolas Alvarez Varona in the final 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4.
George has an overall 49-15 win-loss record in 2025, 19-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Cina
31 - 19win/loss
225
202
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-21 | 17-7 | 10-9 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 18-15 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227, Cina got to the semifinal after defeating Milos Karol 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4, Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 6-1 and Tom Gentzsch 6-2 6-2.
In the quarter, Federico had a good straight sets win against Gentzsch (6-2 6-2). During the match Cina scored 65 points vs Gentzsch’s 47. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Cina made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Federico Cina lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Cina put 67% of his first serves in, winning 64% (28/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the 2nd serve. Cina broke Gentzsch 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Federico has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,the Hersonissos 2 Challenger and the Tbilisi Challenger.
Cina has a composed 31-19 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Loffhagen | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 68 |
| Pts | 178-153 | 231-194 |
| Total Points | 331 | 425 |
| Winners | 88 | 117 |
| %Winners | 49% | 51% |
Loffhagen played 2 matches while Cina competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. George Loffhagen surrendered 1 set, while Federico Cina lost 1 set. Loffhagen has played 2 set(s) less than Cina (5 vs 7). Therefore, Loffhagen played 13 games less than Cina. George scored 88 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian struck 117 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Loffhagen | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 29 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 14.5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 105/167 | 167/227 |
| %1st in | 63% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 88/105 | 117/167 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 36/62 | 30/60 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 50% |
Loffhagen fired 29 aces (14.5 per match). Cina fired 18 aces (6 per match). Loffhagen won 84% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Cina won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Loffhagen | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 12 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 12/21 |
| % Converted | 67% | 57% |
| Conceded | 4 | 19 |
| Saved | 2 | 15 |
| % Saved | 50% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Loffhagen broke his opponents 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Loffhagen surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Cina conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Loffhagen | |||||
| R1 Topo | R2 Glinka | 1/4 Squire | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-710 7-5 6-1 | w/o | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | – | 23 | 55 | |
| pts | 113-100 | – | 65-53 | 178-153 | |
| Total points | 213 | – | 118 | 331 | |
| Winners | 59 | – | 29 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 52% | – | 45% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | – | 17 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | – | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 69/109 | – | 36/58 | 105/167 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | – | 62% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 59/69 | – | 29/36 | 88/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | – | 81% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | – | 17/22 | 36/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | – | 77% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | – | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | – | 2/2 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 57% | – | 100% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | – | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | – | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 0% | 22% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | |
| Cina | |||||
| R1 Karol | R2 Kuzmanov | 1/4 Gentzsch | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 5-7 6-4 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 17 | 16 | 68 | |
| pts | 106-107 | 60-40 | 65-47 | 231-194 | |
| Total points | 213 | 100 | 112 | 425 | |
| Winners | 59 | 30 | 28 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 50% | 43% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 11 | 2 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 81/112 | 42/49 | 44/66 | 167/227 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 86% | 67% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 59/81 | 30/42 | 28/44 | 117/167 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 71% | 64% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 5/7 | 12/22 | 30/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 71% | 55% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/11 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 80% | 45% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 3/3 | 5/6 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 100% | 83% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Hamburg Challenger
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Henri SquireSquire (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Matej DodigDodig (4-6 7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Tom GentzschGentzsch (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Milos Karol/Patrik Niklas-SalminenKarol/Patrik Niklas-Salminen – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael Geerts/Tim RuehlGeerts/Tim Ruehl – Patrick Kaukovalta/Eero VasaKaukovalta/Eero Vasa (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Matej DodigDodig (4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Henri SquireSquire (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Tom GentzschGentzsch (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction