Jordan Thompson and Erik Arutiunian will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on SIOUX FALLS FORD LINCOLN STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 2 sets.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.037
Erik Arutiunian -> 9.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Erik Arutiunian
There is no head to head record between Jordan Thompson and Erik Arutiunian since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jordan Thompson
16 - 17win/loss
108
26
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-18 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-24 | 23-13 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 79, Thompson reached the 2nd round after beating Michael Mmoh 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jordan had a good straight sets win against Mmoh (6-3 6-4). During the match, Thompson scored 62 points vs Mmoh’s 49. Thompson was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Thompson made 5 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Jordan Thompson lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Thompson put 58% of his first serves in, winning 83% (29/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Jordan broke Mmoh 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Thompson has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (335-242). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Thompson has an overall 42-22 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Australian has an aggregate 15-17 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
Jordan has never competed in this tournament before.
Erik Arutiunian
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-20 | 34-15 | 0-0 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 2-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-30 | 21-16 | 20-12 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-23 | 12-17 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-7 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 547, Arutiunian reached the 2nd round after defeating Dante Carlos Teramo 6-1 6-3, Nicolas Arseneault 6-4 6-2 and Patrick Zahraj 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Erik had a good straight sets win against Zahraj (6-1 6-2). During the match Arutiunian scored 54 points vs Zahraj’s 30. Erik was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Arutiunian bagged 9 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Erik Arutiunian was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (22/26) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Arutiunian broke Zahraj 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Arutiunian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
The Belarussian has a composed 39-17 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thompson | Arutiunian |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 49 |
| Pts | 62-49 | 186-123 |
| Total Points | 111 | 309 |
| Winners | 29 | 73 |
| %Winners | 47% | 39% |
Thompson played 1 match while Arutiunian competed in 3 matches. Arutiunian started his run from the qualifications while Thompson had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Thompson has played 4 set(s) less than Arutiunian (2 vs 6). Therefore, Thompson played 30 games less than Arutiunian. Jordan scored 29 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Erik struck 73 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thompson | Arutiunian |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 91/152 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 73/91 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 37/61 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 61% |
Thompson made 5 aces . Arutiunian blasted 25 aces (8.3 per match). Thompson won 83% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Arutiunian won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thompson | Arutiunian |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 12/21 |
| % Converted | 60% | 57% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 75% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Jordan broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Jordan surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Arutiunian broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Erik conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Thompson | |||
| R1 Mmoh | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 62-49 | 62-49 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Arutiunian | |||||
| Q1 Carlos | Q3 Arseneault | R1 Zahraj | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 | 15 | 49 | |
| pts | 61-40 | 71-53 | 54-30 | 186-123 | |
| Total points | 101 | 124 | 84 | 309 | |
| Winners | 25 | 26 | 22 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 9 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 34/60 | 26/41 | 91/152 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 57% | 63% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 26/34 | 22/26 | 73/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 76% | 85% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 17/26 | 11/15 | 37/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 65% | 73% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 60% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 5/5 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 100% | – | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Sioux Falls Challenger
- Rafael JodarJodar – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Brandon HoltHolt (4-3 ret. (Holt ret.)) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Michael ZhengZheng (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Samir BanerjeeBanerjee – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Oliver TarvetTarvet (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Erik ArutiunianArutiunian – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Jay ClarkeClarke (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Andrew FentyFenty – Keegan SmithSmith (4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Darwin BlanchBlanch (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-65 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Michael ZhengZheng (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Oliver TarvetTarvet (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Samir BanerjeeBanerjee – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Jay ClarkeClarke (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Andrew FentyFenty – Keegan SmithSmith (4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Brandon HoltHolt (4-3 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-1) – H2H and prediction