Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima will play each other in the 2nd round of the Erste Bank Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:30 pm on #GLAUBANDICH COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 3 sets.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.88
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Brandon Nakashima
This will be the 2nd time that Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nakashima (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Nakashima won 7-6(6) 6-4 6-2 in the 2nd round in at the French Open back in 2022.
Tallon Griekspoor
31 - 23win/loss
25
21
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-24 | 10-11 | 13-8 | 5-4 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-30 | 10-11 | 8-8 | 11-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 14-10 | 3-5 | 12-7 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-6 | 12-6 | 4-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 59-17 | 11-3 | 36-10 | 9-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 28, Tallon got to the 2nd round after defeating Karen Khachanov 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the 1st round, Tallon defeated Khachanov (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match, Griekspoor scored 89 points vs Khachanov’s 80. Griekspoor was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Griekspoor fired 11 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tallon Griekspoor was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (41/52) of his 1st serve and 73% (22/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Khachanov twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Griekspoor has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (364-218). 4-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Griekspoor has an aggregate 66-52 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in Mallorca where he beat Corentin Moutet in the final 7-5 7-6(3).
The Dutch has a composed 31-23 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Brandon Nakashima
33 - 27win/loss
33
29
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-30 | 19-14 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 61-32 | 24-12 | 13-7 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 32, Nakashima got to the 2nd round after beating Luciano Darderi 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Darderi (6-2 7-5). During the match Nakashima scored 74 points vs Darderi’s 61. Nakashima was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Nakashima fired 7 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Brandon Nakashima was extremely efficient on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Brandon broke Darderi 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Nakashima’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Acapulco, Houston and Chengdu.
Nakashima has an aggregate 33-27 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 20 |
| Pts | 89-80 | 74-61 |
| Total Points | 169 | 135 |
| Winners | 41 | 27 |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% |
Both Griekspoor and Nakashima played 1 match. At the moment, Tallon Griekspoor dropped 1 set while Brandon Nakashima hasn’t conceded a set so far. Griekspoor has played 1 set more than Nakashima (3 vs 2). Therefore, Griekspoor played 11 games more than Nakashima. The Dutch scored 41 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Brandon recorded 27 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 7 |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 32/54 |
| %1st in | 63% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 27/32 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 22/30 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 59% |
Griekspoor made 11 aces . Nakashima bagged 7 aces . Griekspoor won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Nakashima won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 29% | 33% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Griekspoor broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Tallon dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Nakashima broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Nakashima was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Griekspoor | |||
| R1 Khachanov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 89-80 | 89-80 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 52/82 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 41/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nakashima | |||
| R1 Darderi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-61 | 74-61 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 32/54 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Vienna
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Andrey RublevRublev (6-2 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Luciano DarderiDarderi (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (7-5 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Andrey RublevRublev (6-2 6-7(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Nuno BorgesBorges (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Alexander BublikBublik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Flavio CobolliCobolli (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-3) – H2H and prediction