Clement Tabur and Mae Malige will face off in the 2nd round of the Brest Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Clement Tabur who should win in 3 sets.
Clement Tabur -> 1.54
Mae Malige -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Clement Tabur vs. Mae Malige
This will be the 3rd time that Clement Tabur and Mae Malige face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Tabur (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Tabur won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in M25 Monastir back in 2023.
Clement Tabur
43 - 20win/loss
201
198
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 49-24 | 11-7 | 30-15 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-33 | 2-4 | 25-26 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-25 | 16-7 | 45-14 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-26 | 20-8 | 16-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-22 | 9-4 | 25-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 261, the French player got to the 2nd round after beating Laurent Lokoli 6-3 7-6(7), Colton Smith 6-2 6-2 and Otto Virtanen 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
In the 1st round against Virtanen, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 7-63). During the match, Tabur scored 119 points vs Virtanen’s 117. The French player was pretty aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tabur fired 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Clement Tabur lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Tabur put 68% of his first serves in, winning 73% (53/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (16/35) on the 2nd serve. Tabur broke Virtanen 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Tabur has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (294-192). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tabur has a composed30-33 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Tabur’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Reus,M25 Angers and M25 Vic.
Tabur has a compiled 43-20 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Mae Malige
33 - 30win/loss
432
418
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-34 | 11-11 | 5-9 | 18-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-19 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 19-10 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 7-14 | 5-4 | 0-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
Ranked no. 434 (career-high), the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Rei Sakamoto 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, Mae had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (7-5 6-1). During the match Malige scored 67 points vs Sakamoto’s 48. The French player was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Malige blasted 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mae Malige was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 78% (28/36) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Sakamoto 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Malige’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Bressuire and Balma.
The French player has an overall 33-30 win-loss record in 2025, 18-11 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Mae has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tabur | Malige |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 74 | 19 |
| Pts | 265-230 | 67-48 |
| Total Points | 495 | 115 |
| Winners | 121 | 28 |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% |
Tabur played 3 matches while Malige competed in 1 match. Tabur started his run from the qualifications while Malige had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Clement Tabur surrendered 1 set while Mae Malige hasn’t lost a set so far. Tabur has played 5 sets more than Malige (7 vs 2). Therefore, Tabur played 55 games more than Malige. The French player scored 121 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The French player bagged 28 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tabur | Malige |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 155/237 | 36/57 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 121/155 | 28/36 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 41/82 | 14/21 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 67% |
Tabur scored 15 aces (5 per match). Malige scored 3 aces . Tabur won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Malige won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tabur | Malige |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 3 |
| Converted | 9/25 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 36% | 75% |
| Conceded | 17 | 0 |
| Saved | 12 | 0 |
| % Saved | 71% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Clement broke his opponents 9 times with a 36% conversion rate. The French player lost his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Mae broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Mae was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Tabur | |||||
| Q1 Lokoli | Q3 Smith | R1 Virtanen | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-67 | 6-2 6-2 | 4-6 7-65 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 | 36 | 74 | |
| pts | 86-74 | 60-39 | 119-117 | 265-230 | |
| Total points | 160 | 99 | 236 | 495 | |
| Winners | 40 | 28 | 53 | 121 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | 45% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 2 | 6 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 49/81 | 33/48 | 73/108 | 155/237 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 69% | 68% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 28/33 | 53/73 | 121/155 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 85% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 7/15 | 16/35 | 41/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 47% | 46% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 4/10 | 4/11 | 9/25 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 40% | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 11 | 17 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 2/2 | 6/11 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 55% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Malige | |||||
| R1 Sakamoto | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |||
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |||
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |||
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |||
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |||
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |||
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |||
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |||
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |||
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |||
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |||
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | – | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Tennis Scores in Brest Challenger
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (3-6 7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Laslo DjereDjere (6-3 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (4-6 7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Joshua Paris/Jack WithrowParis/Jack Withrow – Diego Hidalgo/Patrik TrhacHidalgo/Patrik Trhac (6-75 6-3 10-7) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (3-6 7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Alexey VatutinVatutin (2-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Jaime FariaFaria (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-1 7-66) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mae MaligeMalige – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Laslo DjereDjere (6-3 3-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Alexey VatutinVatutin (2-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (3-6 7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Jaime FariaFaria (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-1 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Lucas PoullainPoullain (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Arthur BouquierBouquier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – August HolmgrenHolmgren (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction