Hamad Medjedovic and Jacob Fearnley will face off in the qualifications of the Erste Bank Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 3:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.47
Jacob Fearnley -> 2.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Jacob Fearnley
This will be the 2nd time that Hamad Medjedovic and Jacob Fearnley clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Medjedovic (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Medjedovic won 6-4 7-6(2) in the 2nd round in Winston salem back in August 2025.
Highlights Hamad Medjedovic vs Jacob Fearnley – Winston salem 19-August-2025
Hamad Medjedovic
28 - 19win/loss
83
57
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-21 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-21 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 64, Medjedovic got to the qualifications after beating Joel Schwaerzler 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Medjedovic had a good straight sets win against Schwaerzler (6-2 6-4). During the match, Medjedovic scored 59 points vs Schwaerzler’s 45. Medjedovic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medjedovic made 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Medjedovic broke Schwaerzler 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Medjedovic has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (173-102). 14-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Medjedovic has an aggregate40-24 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Oeiras 1 Challenger where he beat Liam Draxl in the final 6-1 6-3.
Hamad has a compiled 28-18 win-loss record in 2025, 14-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Medjedovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Jacob Fearnley
31 - 24win/loss
71
49
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-27 | 11-10 | 10-6 | 9-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 81, Fearnley got to the qualifications after defeating Dalibor Svrcina 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (6-4 7-5). During the match Fearnley scored 71 points vs Svrcina’s 60. Fearnley was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Fearnley fired 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jacob Fearnley lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Fearnley put 60% of his first serves in, winning 78% (31/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Fearnley broke Svrcina 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Fearnley’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 30-24 win-loss record in 2025, 6-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medjedovic | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 |
| Pts | 59-45 | 71-60 |
| Total Points | 104 | 131 |
| Winners | 30 | 31 |
| %Winners | 51% | 44% |
Both Medjedovic and Fearnley played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Medjedovic and Fearnley have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Medjedovic played 4 games less than Fearnley. The Serbian scored 30 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob bagged 31 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medjedovic | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/50 | 40/67 |
| %1st in | 78% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 31/40 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 12/27 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 44% |
Medjedovic bagged 8 aces . Fearnley made 4 aces . Medjedovic won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medjedovic | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Hamad broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Hamad extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Fearnley broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Fearnley conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medjedovic | |||
| Q1 Schwaerzler | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-45 | 59-45 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/50 | 39/50 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fearnley | |||
| Q1 Svrcina | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 71-60 | 71-60 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 40/67 | 40/67 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Nuno BorgesBorges (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Andrey RublevRublev (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Alexander BublikBublik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Filip MisolicMisolic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Flavio CobolliCobolli (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-1) – H2H and prediction