Reilly Opelka and Botic Van De Zandschulp will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Swiss Indoors Basel for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 3:30 pm on IWB COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.75
Reilly Opelka -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Reilly Opelka vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Reilly Opelka and Botic Van De Zandschulp square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Van De Zandschulp won 7-6(6) 7-6(4) in the 3rd round in Melbourne back in 2021.
Reilly Opelka
29 - 25win/loss
50
17
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-28 | 14-11 | 5-6 | 7-6 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-10 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 10-7 | 6-5 | 4-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 14-11 | 6-4 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 62, Reilly got to the qualifications after defeating Mika Brunold 6-7(6) 7-6(9) 7-5.
In the qualifications against Brunold, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 7-69 7-5). During the match, Opelka scored 133 points vs Brunold’s 121. Reilly was exceptionally aggressive to blast 58 winners.
Talking about the service games, Opelka overwhelmed his opponent with 26 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Reilly Opelka was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (58/79) of his 1st serve and 73% (22/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Opelka broke Brunold 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Opelka has good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (215-169). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Opelka has a composed 46-23 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in Brisbane.
Opelka has a composed 29-25 win-loss record in 2025, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
Botic Van De Zandschulp
27 - 28win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 86, the Dutch reached the qualifications after defeating Mattia Bellucci 7-6(6) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Bellucci (7-66 6-4). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 76 points vs Bellucci’s 68. Botic was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp made 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 71% of his first serves in, winning 83% (39/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Bellucci twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Botic’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in Salem.
Botic has a composed 27-28 win-loss record in 2025, 2-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022, 2023 and 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Opelka | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 23 |
| Pts | 133-121 | 76-68 |
| Total Points | 254 | 144 |
| Winners | 58 | 39 |
| %Winners | 44% | 51% |
Both Opelka and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Reilly Opelka conceded 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Opelka has played 1 set more than Van De Zandschulp (3 vs 2). Therefore, Opelka played 15 games more than Van De Zandschulp. The American scored 58 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Botic recorded 39 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Opelka | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 26 | 9 |
| 1st in | 79/109 | 47/66 |
| %1st in | 72% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 58/79 | 39/47 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 22/30 | 9/19 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 47% |
Opelka struck 26 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 9 aces . Opelka won 73% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Opelka | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/14 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 21% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Opelka broke his opponent 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Opelka | |||
| Q1 Brunold | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 7-69 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 38 | 38 | |
| pts | 133-121 | 133-121 | |
| Total points | 254 | 254 | |
| Winners | 58 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 26 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 79/109 | 79/109 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 58/79 | 58/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 3/14 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| Q1 Bellucci | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 76-68 | 76-68 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/66 | 47/66 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 39/47 | 39/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Marin CilicCilic (5-4) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction