Botic Van De Zandschulp and Eliot Spizzirri will play each other in the 2nd round of the European Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 8:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.48
Eliot Spizzirri -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Eliot Spizzirri
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Eliot Spizzirri since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
26 - 27win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 86, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Joao Fonseca 7-5 7-6(2).
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Fonseca (7-5 7-62). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 92 points vs Fonseca’s 76. Botic was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 15 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 67% of his first serves in, winning 88% (42/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (9/24) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Fonseca 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (349-223). 1-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a composed 94-55 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Salem.
Botic has a compiled 26-27 win-loss record in 2025, 1-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Brussels
Eliot Spizzirri
46 - 27win/loss
91
87
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-31 | 27-14 | 7-6 | 17-5 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-17 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-4 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 111, Eliot reached the 2nd round after defeating Zsombor Piros 5-7 7-6(6) 6-1, Alexander Blockx 7-6(4) 6-3 and Pedro Martinez Portero 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Eliot had a good straight sets win against Martinez Portero (6-4 6-1). During the match Spizzirri scored 60 points vs Martinez Portero’s 36. Spizzirri was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Spizzirri made 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Eliot Spizzirri was extremely efficient on serve to win 96% (27/28) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Eliot broke Martinez Portero 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
His best result of the season was winning the title the San Diego Challenger where he beat Mackenzie Mcdonald in the final 6-4 2-6 6-4 and the Jingshan Challenger where he defeated Alex Bolt in the final 6-4 6-4.
The American has a compiled 46-27 win-loss record in 2025, 7-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Spizzirri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 71 |
| Pts | 92-76 | 242-186 |
| Total Points | 168 | 428 |
| Winners | 42 | 119 |
| %Winners | 46% | 49% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Spizzirri competed in 3 matches. Spizzirri started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Eliot Spizzirri surrendered 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t dropped a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 5 set(s) less than Spizzirri (2 vs 7). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 46 games less than Spizzirri. Van De Zandschulp scored 42 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 119 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Spizzirri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 151/215 |
| %1st in | 67% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 42/48 | 119/151 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 9/24 | 33/64 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 52% |
Van De Zandschulp struck 15 aces . Spizzirri scored 17 aces (5.7 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 88% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Spizzirri won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Spizzirri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 8 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 8/14 |
| % Converted | 38% | 57% |
| Conceded | 4 | 11 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 50% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Botic broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Botic lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Spizzirri broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Spizzirri conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Fonseca | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 92-76 | 92-76 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 48/72 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 42/48 | 42/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/24 | 9/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Spizzirri | |||||
| Q1 Piros | Q3 Blockx | R1 Martinez Portero | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-66 6-1 | 7-64 6-3 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 22 | 17 | 71 | |
| pts | 101-84 | 81-66 | 60-36 | 242-186 | |
| Total points | 185 | 147 | 96 | 428 | |
| Winners | 48 | 44 | 27 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 54% | 45% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 5 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 64/92 | 59/76 | 28/47 | 151/215 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 78% | 60% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 48/64 | 44/59 | 27/28 | 119/151 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | 96% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 8/17 | 10/19 | 33/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 47% | 53% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/4 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 40% | 75% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 | 0 | 11 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 5/6 | 0/0 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 83% | – | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Brussels
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Federico CinaCina (6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Christian Harrison/Evan KingHarrison/Evan King – Marcel Granollers/Pedro Martinez PorteroGranollers/Pedro Martinez Portero (3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (7-64 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Gilles Arnaud BaillyArnaud Bailly – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 6-710 6-3) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – David GoffinGoffin (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Zizou BergsBergs (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Joao FonsecaFonseca (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin Bonzi/Pierre-Hugues HerbertBonzi/Pierre-Hugues Herbert – Sander Arends/Luke JohnsonArends/Luke Johnson (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander Blockx/Tibo ColsonBlockx/Tibo Colson – Sebastian Baez/Francisco ComesanaBaez/Francisco Comesana (3-6 6-4 10-5) – See score progression
- Ariel Behar/Joran VliegenBehar/Joran Vliegen – Romain Arneodo/Sander GilleArneodo/Sander Gille (7-68 6-79 10-8) – See score progression
- Petr Nouza/Patrik RiklNouza/Patrik Rikl – Gregoire Jacq/Nicolas MahutJacq/Nicolas Mahut (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction