Jack Pinnington Jones and Michael Mmoh will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 3 sets.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.86
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Michael Mmoh
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Michael Mmoh since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
24 - 14win/loss
199
177
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, Pinnington Jones got to the 2nd round after defeating Mitchell Krueger 7-6(6) 6-1.
In the 1st round, Pinnington Jones had a good straight sets win against Krueger (7-66 6-1). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 80 points vs Krueger’s 61. Pinnington Jones was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pinnington Jones scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Jack Pinnington Jones was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (27/38) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Krueger 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Pinnington Jones has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (104-58). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pinnington Jones has a compiled9-9 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Nottingham 3 Challenger where he beat Kyle Edmund in the final 6-4 7-6(1) and the Salem Challenger where he beat Trevor Svajda in the final 6-2 6-2.
The Brit has an aggregate 24-13 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-16 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, Michael got to the 2nd round after beating Olle Wallin 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Michael had a good straight sets win against Wallin (6-4 6-2). During the match Mmoh scored 70 points vs Wallin’s 49. Mmoh was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Mmoh made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Michael Mmoh was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 90% (26/29) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mmoh broke Wallin 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The American has an aggregate 15-13 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 |
| Pts | 80-61 | 70-49 |
| Total Points | 141 | 119 |
| Winners | 27 | 26 |
| %Winners | 34% | 37% |
Both Pinnington Jones and Mmoh played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pinnington Jones and Mmoh have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pinnington Jones played 2 games more than Mmoh. Jack scored 27 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 26 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 29/41 |
| %1st in | 59% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 27/38 | 26/29 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 7/12 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 58% |
Pinnington Jones scored 2 aces . Mmoh recorded 6 aces . Pinnington Jones won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 30% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 80% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Pinnington Jones broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Jack surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Mmoh conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | |||
| R1 Krueger | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 80-61 | 80-61 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 38/64 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 27/38 | 27/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mmoh | |||
| R1 Wallin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 70-49 | 70-49 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 26/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Sydney ZickZick (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Nicolas ArseneaultArseneault (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Andrew FentyFenty (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Murphy CassoneCassone (1-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Jeri LassilaLassila (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Samir BanerjeeBanerjee – Adhithya GanesanGanesan (7-5 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Olle WallinWallin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Alex RybakovRybakov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Jeri LassilaLassila (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Sydney ZickZick (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Nicolas ArseneaultArseneault (4-6 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Andrew FentyFenty (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Murphy CassoneCassone (1-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction