Nerman Fatic and Carlo Alberto Caniato will play each other in the 2nd round of the Olbia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.47
Carlo Alberto Caniato -> 2.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Carlo Alberto Caniato
There is no head to head record between Nerman Fatic and Carlo Alberto Caniato since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Nerman Fatic
44 - 14win/loss
214
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-17 | 2-1 | 44-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, Nerman got to the 2nd round after beating Roberto Carballes Baena 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Carballes Baena (6-2 7-5). During the match, Fatic scored 74 points vs Carballes Baena’s 59. Fatic was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic fired 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 64% of his first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 29% (7/24) on the 2nd serve. The Bosnian broke Carballes Baena 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Fatic has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (330-204). 1-0 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a composed 21-21 record in the last years on hard.
Nerman’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec,M15 Dubrovnik,the Skopje Challenger,the Perugia Challenger and M25 Zlatibor.
Nerman has a compiled 44-14 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Olbia Challenger
The Bosnian has never competed in this tournament before.
Carlo Alberto Caniato
32 - 20win/loss
392
389
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-21 | 10-6 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-26 | 3-4 | 25-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 466 (career-high), Alberto reached the 2nd round after beating Dan Added 7-5 7-5.
In the 1st round, Carlo had a good straight sets win against Added (7-5 7-5). During the match Alberto scored 73 points vs Added’s 68. Alberto was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Alberto blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Carlo Alberto Caniato lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Alberto put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Added 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Cattolica and M25+H Bacau.
Alberto has an overall 32-20 win-loss record in 2025, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Alberto |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 24 |
| Pts | 74-59 | 73-68 |
| Total Points | 133 | 141 |
| Winners | 34 | 33 |
| %Winners | 46% | 45% |
Both Fatic and Alberto played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fatic and Alberto have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fatic played 4 games less than Alberto. Fatic scored 34 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Carlo fired 33 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Alberto |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 42/66 | 47/67 |
| %1st in | 64% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 34/42 | 33/47 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/24 | 9/20 |
| %2nd pts | 29% | 45% |
Fatic bagged 10 aces . Alberto bagged 3 aces . Fatic won 81% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 29% of the points. On the other side, Alberto won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Alberto |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 38% | 57% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 60% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Bosnian broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Nerman lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Alberto broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Carballes Baena | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 74-59 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/66 | 42/66 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/42 | 34/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/24 | 7/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Alberto | |||
| R1 Added | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 73-68 | 73-68 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/67 | 47/67 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 33/47 | 33/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 9/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Olbia Challenger
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Lorenzo CarboniCarboni (4-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Michele RibecaiRibecai (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-1 6-74 6-4) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Francesco FortiForti (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Clement TaburTabur (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur GeaGea – Tom ParisParis (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Carlo Alberto CaniatoAlberto Caniato – Dan AddedAdded (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Marek GengelGengel (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (7-5 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – Hugo GrenierGrenier (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-1) – H2H and prediction