Dan Martin and Adhithya Ganesan will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Lincoln Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adhithya Ganesan who should win in 3 sets.
Adhithya Ganesan -> 1.66
Dan Martin -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dan Martin vs. Adhithya Ganesan
This will be the 2nd time that Dan Martin and Adhithya Ganesan clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ganesan (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Ganesan won 7-5 6-2 in the quarter in M15 Kingston back in 2024.
Dan Martin
28 - 26win/loss
423
419
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 10-14 | 11-9 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 14-15 | 9-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-13 | 0-7 | 5-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 14-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 455, Dan reached the qualifications after beating Nikolay Sysoev 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Martin had a good straight sets win against Sysoev (7-5 6-4). During the match, Martin scored 71 points vs Sysoev’s 56. Dan was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Dan Martin was very effective on serve to win 85% (35/41) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Dan broke Sysoev 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Martin has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 52% of his matches (95-89). 7-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin has a composed16-16 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Dan’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Villahermosa.
The Canadian has an aggregate 28-25 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Dan has never competed in this tournament before.
Adhithya Ganesan
24 - 17win/loss
571
544
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-22 | 11-11 | 9-4 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-21 | 23-17 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 556, Adhithya reached the qualifications after defeating Niels Van Der Sijs 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Van Der Sijs (6-2 6-4). During the match Ganesan scored 67 points vs Van Der Sijs’s 44. Adhithya was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Ganesan fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Adhithya Ganesan was very efficient on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Van Der Sijs 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Orlando and M25 Hillcrest.
Adhithya has an aggregate 23-17 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin | Ganesan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 71-56 | 67-44 |
| Total Points | 127 | 111 |
| Winners | 35 | 23 |
| %Winners | 49% | 34% |
Both Martin and Ganesan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martin and Ganesan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martin played 4 games more than Ganesan. Dan scored 35 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 23 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin | Ganesan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 41/56 | 25/50 |
| %1st in | 73% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 35/41 | 23/25 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 92% |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 16/25 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 64% |
Martin blasted 3 aces . Ganesan blasted 3 aces . Martin won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Ganesan won 92% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin | Ganesan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 33% | 43% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Canadian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Dan surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Adhithya was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Martin | |||
| Q1 Sysoev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 71-56 | 71-56 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/56 | 41/56 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 35/41 | 35/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ganesan | |||
| Q1 Van Der Sijs | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-44 | 67-44 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/50 | 25/50 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 23/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Keegan SmithSmith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Justin BoulaisBoulais (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew FentyFenty – Karl PolingPoling (0-0) – H2H and prediction