Ethan Quinn and Mark Lajal will play each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Nordic Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.74
Mark Lajal -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Mark Lajal
This will be the 2nd time that Ethan Quinn and Mark Lajal fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Quinn (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Quinn won 7-5 7-5 in the qualifications in at the French Open back in May 2025.
Ethan Quinn
41 - 25win/loss
70
64
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-28 | 22-14 | 11-6 | 7-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 72 (career-high), Ethan reached the qualifications after defeating Nikola Slavic 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Slavic (6-3 6-2). During the match, Quinn scored 63 points vs Slavic’s 42. Quinn was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn made 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Ethan Quinn was extremely efficient on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ethan broke Slavic 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Quinn has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (129-92). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quinn has a composed28-17 win-loss record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Ethan’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Canberra Challenger.
Ethan has an overall 41-25 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stockholm
Quinn has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Lajal
40 - 20win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 14-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146, Lajal reached the qualifications after defeating Rei Sakamoto 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-1 6-4). During the match Lajal scored 68 points vs Sakamoto’s 55. Mark was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Lajal made 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Mark Lajal lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Lajal put 56% of his first serves in, winning 79% (30/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (11/30) on the 2nd serve. Lajal broke Sakamoto 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he defeated Andres Martin in the final 6-7(7) 7-5 7-6(9).
Mark has an aggregate 40-20 win-loss record in 2025, 9-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 |
| Pts | 63-42 | 68-55 |
| Total Points | 105 | 123 |
| Winners | 32 | 30 |
| %Winners | 51% | 44% |
Both Quinn and Lajal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Quinn and Lajal have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (17). Ethan scored 32 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Mark scored 30 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 38/68 |
| %1st in | 72% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 30/38 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 11/30 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 37% |
Quinn fired 13 aces . Lajal managed to score 4 aces . Quinn won 82% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 60% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Ethan broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Ethan was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points. Mark broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Mark conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quinn | |||
| Q1 Slavic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-42 | 63-42 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 39/54 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lajal | |||
| Q1 Sakamoto | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-55 | 68-55 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 30/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/30 | 11/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elias YmerYmer – Mikael YmerYmer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Sebastian KordaKorda (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (0-0) – H2H and prediction