Dominic Stricker and Matej Dodig will clash against each other in the quarter of the Roanne Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 9:00 pm on CENTRAL A.VACHERESSE. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Stricker who should win in 3 sets.
Dominic Stricker -> 1.62
Matej Dodig -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dominic Stricker vs. Matej Dodig
There is no head to head record between Dominic Stricker and Matej Dodig since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dominic Stricker
21 - 20win/loss
368
88
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-21 | 0-5 | 11-9 | 4-5 | 2-1 | 4-1 |
| 2024 | 12-15 | 7-6 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-25 | 8-3 | 8-5 | 14-13 | 6-3 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 37-25 | 2-5 | 8-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 14-7 | 2-2 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 247, Stricker got to the quarter after defeating Leo Raquillet 6-1 6-4, David Jorda Sanchis 6-2 6-3, Chris Rodesch 6-4 7-6(5) and Jacob Fearnley 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Dominic had a good straight sets win against Fearnley (6-4 6-4). During the match, Stricker scored 67 points vs Fearnley’s 54. The Swiss was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stricker made 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominic Stricker was extremely efficient on serve to win 87% (34/39) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Stricker broke Fearnley twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dominic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Stricker has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (140-110). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Stricker has a composed59-38 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Dominic’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trimbach and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Dominic has an overall 21-20 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roanne Challenger
Dominic has never competed in this tournament before.
Matej Dodig
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-32 | 0-0 | 24-22 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-26 | 14-5 | 30-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-16 | 1-2 | 38-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 278, the Croatian got to the quarter after beating Christopher Eubanks 6-4 6-4 and Francesco Passaro 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Dodig had a good straight sets win against Passaro (6-3 6-4). During the match Dodig scored 66 points vs Passaro’s 49. Dodig was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Dodig blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Matej Dodig was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (33/39) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian broke Passaro twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dodig hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Trieste Challenger where he beat Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 6-3 6-4.
Matej has a composed 26-26 win-loss record in 2025, 2-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stricker | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 39 |
| Pts | 245-188 | 135-105 |
| Total Points | 433 | 240 |
| Winners | 108 | 65 |
| %Winners | 44% | 48% |
Stricker played 4 matches while Dodig competed in 2 matches. Stricker started his run from the qualifications while Dodig had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Stricker has played 4 sets more than Dodig (8 vs 4). Therefore, Stricker played 38 games more than Dodig. Stricker scored 108 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Matej managed to score 65 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stricker | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 134/218 | 82/116 |
| %1st in | 61% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 108/134 | 65/82 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 54/84 | 19/34 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 56% |
Stricker struck 18 aces (4.5 per match). Dodig recorded 13 aces (6.5 per match). Stricker won 81% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Dodig won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stricker | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 5 |
| Converted | 11/19 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 58% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Dominic broke his opponents 11 times with a 58% conversion rate. Dominic conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Matej conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stricker | ||||||
| Q1 Raquillet | Q3 Jorda Sanchis | R1 Rodesch | R2 Fearnley | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 7-65 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 23 | 20 | 77 | |
| pts | 61-40 | 55-29 | 62-65 | 67-54 | 245-188 | |
| Total points | 101 | 84 | 127 | 121 | 433 | |
| Winners | 22 | 21 | 31 | 34 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% | 50% | 51% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/49 | 21/41 | 44/66 | 39/62 | 134/218 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 51% | 67% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 21/21 | 31/44 | 34/39 | 108/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 100% | 70% | 87% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 15/20 | 12/22 | 12/23 | 54/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 75% | 55% | 52% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 2/5 | 11/19 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 75% | 40% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | 100% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Dodig | ||||||
| R1 Eubanks | R2 Passaro | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 39 | |||
| pts | 69-56 | 66-49 | 135-105 | |||
| Total points | 125 | 115 | 240 | |||
| Winners | 32 | 33 | 65 | |||
| %Winners | 46% | 50% | 48% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 7 | 13 | |||
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| 1st in | 43/61 | 39/55 | 82/116 | |||
| % 1st in | 70% | 71% | 71% | |||
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 33/39 | 65/82 | |||
| % 1st pts | 74% | 85% | 79% | |||
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 9/16 | 19/34 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | 56% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Converted | 3/4 | 2/5 | 5/9 | |||
| Converted % | 75% | 40% | 56% | |||
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 3 | |||
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 42% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Borna GojoGojo – Hugo GastonGaston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction