Abedallah Shelbayh and Roger Pascual Ferra will square off in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on LEIF HAASE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Abedallah Shelbayh who should win in 2 sets.
Abedallah Shelbayh -> 1.222
Roger Pascual Ferra -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Abedallah Shelbayh vs. Roger Pascual Ferra
There is no head to head record between Abedallah Shelbayh and Roger Pascual Ferra since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Abedallah Shelbayh
27 - 27win/loss
278
181
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-29 | 24-13 | 0-11 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-35 | 18-13 | 12-13 | 8-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-32 | 27-15 | 7-7 | 5-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-7 | 17-5 | 3-1 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-8 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, Abedallah reached the 2nd round after beating Bor Artnak 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Abedallah had a good straight sets win against Artnak (6-1 7-5). During the match, Shelbayh scored 67 points vs Artnak’s 51. The was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Shelbayh wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Abedallah Shelbayh was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (20/28) of his 1st serve and 76% (22/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Abedallah broke Artnak 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Shelbayh has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (145-113). 23-11 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Shelbayh has a composed92-50 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Las Vegas Challenger where he overcame Alex Rybakov in the final 6-2 6-4.
Shelbayh has a composed 26-27 win-loss record in 2025, 23-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Abedallah has never competed in this tournament before.
Roger Pascual Ferra
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-9 | 21-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-17 | 13-8 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 819, Pascual got to the 2nd round after beating Nicholas Godsick 6-3 7-6(3), Strong Kirchheimer 6-2 7-5 and Emon Van Loben Sels 5-7 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Van Loben Sels, The Spaniard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 7-5). During the match Pascual scored 119 points vs Van Loben Sels’s 112. Roger was exceptionally aggressive to blast 58 winners.
Talking about serving, Pascual scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Roger Pascual Ferra lost the serve 4 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Pascual put 69% of his first serves in, winning 65% (58/89) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. Pascual broke Van Loben Sels 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The Spaniard’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Roda de Bara.
Pascual has an aggregate 20-7 win-loss record in 2025, 20-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shelbayh | Pascual |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 74 |
| Pts | 67-51 | 276-244 |
| Total Points | 118 | 520 |
| Winners | 20 | 122 |
| %Winners | 30% | 44% |
Shelbayh played 1 match while Pascual competed in 3 matches. Pascual started his run from the qualifications while Shelbayh had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Roger Pascual Ferra surrendered 1 set while Abedallah Shelbayh hasn’t lost a set so far. Shelbayh has played 5 set(s) less than Pascual (2 vs 7). Therefore, Shelbayh played 55 games less than Pascual. Shelbayh scored 20 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Roger struck 122 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shelbayh | Pascual |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0.3 |
| 1st in | 28/57 | 172/274 |
| %1st in | 49% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 122/172 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 22/29 | 42/102 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 41% |
Shelbayh didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pascual fired 1 ace (0.3 per match). Shelbayh won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Pascual won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shelbayh | Pascual |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 15 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 15/27 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 27 |
| Saved | 4 | 19 |
| % Saved | 100% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
Shelbayh broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Shelbayh pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Spaniard broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Shelbayh | |||
| R1 Artnak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-51 | 67-51 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Pascual | |||||
| Q1 Godsick | Q3 Kirchheimer | R1 Van Loben Sels | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | 6-2 7-5 | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 | 32 | 74 | |
| pts | 79-67 | 78-65 | 119-112 | 276-244 | |
| Total points | 146 | 143 | 231 | 520 | |
| Winners | 34 | 30 | 58 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% | 49% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 45/82 | 38/63 | 89/129 | 172/274 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 60% | 69% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 30/38 | 58/89 | 122/172 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 79% | 65% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/37 | 9/25 | 16/40 | 42/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 36% | 40% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/11 | 6/9 | 15/27 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 45% | 67% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 16 | 27 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 1/3 | 12/16 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 33% | 75% | 183% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 5-7 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Micah BraswellBraswell (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Andrew FentyFenty (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominique RollandRolland – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction