Marek Gengel and Edward Winter will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on GROSSMAN – KENNEDY COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edward Winter who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Edward Winter is the pick to win this match.
Edward Winter -> 1.727
Marek Gengel -> 2.03

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Edward Winter

There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Edward Winter since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.

Marek Gengel

Marek Gengel

18 - 26win/loss

Hard
18-23
I Hard
0-1
Clay
0-1
Grass
0-1
Rank
323
High
229
LWLWLLLWLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 20-30 20-26 0-1 0-2 0-1 0-0
2024 85-26 82-22 3-4 0-0 0-0 0-0
2023 16-27 14-15 0-7 2-4 0-1 0-0
2022 42-29 28-16 4-8 10-4 0-0 0-1
2021 52-28 47-14 3-8 2-5 0-1 0-0

Ranked no. 245, the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Bynoe 6-4 6-1.

In the 1st round, Gengel had a good straight sets win against Bynoe (6-4 6-1). During the match, Gengel scored 63 points vs Bynoe’s 41. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.

Regarding the service games, Gengel blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marek Gengel was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marek broke Bynoe 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).

Gengel has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (338-247). 18-22 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gengel has an aggregate 271-140 win-loss record in the last years on hard.

Marek’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Brisbane 1 Challenger.

Gengel has a composed 18-25 win-loss record in 2025, 18-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Fairfield Challenger

Gengel has never competed in this tournament before.

Fairfield Challenger
Gengel's Record

Edward Winter

Edward Winter

32 - 18win/loss

Hard
30-15
I Hard
0-2
Grass
2-1
Rank
465
High
454
LLLWWWWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 34-21 32-16 0-0 0-4 2-1 0-0
2024 27-19 25-17 2-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
2023 24-20 19-17 0-0 3-1 2-2 0-0
2022 12-11 10-10 2-1 0-0 0-0 0-0
2021 4-1 4-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 536, Winter got to the 2nd round after beating Axel Nefve 6-1 6-3, Jacob Brumm 6-4 6-0 and Olle Wallin 6-3 6-4.

In the 1st round, Edward had a good straight sets win against Wallin (6-3 6-4). During the match Winter scored 70 points vs Wallin’s 57. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.

Talking about serving, Winter made 3 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Edward Winter conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Winter put 73% of his first serves in, winning 69% (35/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the 2nd serve. Winter broke Wallin twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).

Edward’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion.

Edward has a composed 31-18 win-loss record in 2025, 29-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Fairfield Challenger
Winter's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament

M.Gengel
E.Winter
1h:05
1h:05
Time on court​
!
3h:54
3h:54
1h:05
1h:05
Last match​
1h:21
1h:21
1
1
Match played
!
3
3
17
17
Games Played​
51
51
2
2
Set played​​
6
6
63
63
Total points​
200
200
63
63
Avg point​
66.7
66.7
24
24
Winners
82
82
24
24
Avg Winners​
27.3
27.3
38%
38%
Ratio winners
41%
41%
-- Serve --
3
3
Aces
6
6
3
3
Avg Aces
2
2
4
4
Double Faults
1
1
4
4
Avg Double Faults
0.3
0.3
24/32
24/32
1st won total​
82/107
82/107
!
75%
75%
1st won %
!
77%
77%
14/23
14/23
2nd won total​
30/44
30/44
!
61%
61%
2nd won %
!
68%
68%
-- Break Points --
4/5
4/5
BP won
11/23
11/23
4/5
4/5
Avg BP won
3.7/7.7
3.7/7.7
!
80%
80%
Won
48%
48%
4
4
Conceded
8
8
4
4
Avg Conceded
2.7
2.7
0
0
Broken
1
1
!
0
0
Avg Broken
!
0.3
0.3
4
4
Saved
7
7

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Gengel Winter
Match played 1 3
Tot Set 2 6
Tot Games 17 51
Pts 63-41 200-136
Total Points 104 336
Winners 24 82
%Winners 38% 41%

Gengel played 1 match while Winter competed in 3 matches. Winter started his run from the qualifications while Gengel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Gengel has played 4 set(s) less than Winter (2 vs 6). Therefore, Gengel played 34 games less than Winter. Gengel scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Winter bagged 82 winners (41%).

Serve Performance

Serve Gengel Winter
Aces 3 6
Avg per match 3 2
1st in 32/55 107/151
%1st in 58% 71%
1st pts 24/32 82/107
%1st pts 75% 77%
2nd pts 14/23 30/44
%2nd pts 61% 68%

Gengel bagged 3 aces . Winter managed to score 6 aces (2 per match). Gengel won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Winter won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Gengel Winter
Won 4 11
Converted 4/5 11/23
% Converted 80% 48%
Conceded 4 8
Saved 4 7
% Saved 100% 88%
Times Broken 0 1

The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Czech quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points. Edward broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.

Gengel
R1
Bynoe
Total
Score 6-4 6-1
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 17 17
pts 63-41 63-41
Total points 104 104
Winners 24 24
%Winners 38% 38%
SERVE
Aces 3 3
Double Faults 4 4
1st in 32/55 32/55
% 1st in 58% 58%
1st pts 24/32 24/32
% 1st pts 75% 75%
2nd pts 14/23 14/23
% 2nd pts 61% 61%
Breaks
Won 4 4
Converted 4/5 4/5
Converted % 80% 80%
Conceded 4 4
Saved 4/4 4
Saved % 100% 100%
Times Broken 0 0
Winter
Q1
Nefve
Q3
Brumm
R1
Wallin
Total
Score 6-1 6-3 6-4 6-0 6-3 6-4
Tot Set 2 2 2 6
Tot Games 16 16 19 51
pts 67-41 63-38 70-57 200-136
Total points 108 101 127 336
Winners 28 19 35 82
%Winners 42% 30% 50% 41%
SERVE
Aces 1 2 3 6
Double Faults 0 1 0 1
1st in 31/41 25/40 51/70 107/151
% 1st in 76% 63% 73% 71%
1st pts 28/31 19/25 35/51 82/107
% 1st pts 90% 76% 69% 77%
2nd pts 5/10 11/15 14/19 30/44
% 2nd pts 50% 73% 74% 68%
Breaks
Won 4 5 2 11
Converted 4/7 5/11 2/5 11/23
Converted % 57% 45% 40% 48%
Conceded 2 1 5 8
Saved 2/2 0/1 5/5 7
Saved % 100% 0% 100% 200%
Times Broken 0 1 0 1

Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger

Upcoming matches in the draw