Marek Gengel and Edward Winter will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on GROSSMAN – KENNEDY COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edward Winter who should win in 3 sets.
Edward Winter -> 1.727
Marek Gengel -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Edward Winter
There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Edward Winter since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Marek Gengel
18 - 26win/loss
323
229
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-30 | 20-26 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 85-26 | 82-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 245, the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Bynoe 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Gengel had a good straight sets win against Bynoe (6-4 6-1). During the match, Gengel scored 63 points vs Bynoe’s 41. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gengel blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marek Gengel was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marek broke Bynoe 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Gengel has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (338-247). 18-22 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gengel has an aggregate 271-140 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Marek’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Brisbane 1 Challenger.
Gengel has a composed 18-25 win-loss record in 2025, 18-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Gengel has never competed in this tournament before.
Edward Winter
32 - 18win/loss
465
454
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-21 | 32-16 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-19 | 25-17 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-20 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 10-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 536, Winter got to the 2nd round after beating Axel Nefve 6-1 6-3, Jacob Brumm 6-4 6-0 and Olle Wallin 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Edward had a good straight sets win against Wallin (6-3 6-4). During the match Winter scored 70 points vs Wallin’s 57. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Winter made 3 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Edward Winter conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Winter put 73% of his first serves in, winning 69% (35/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the 2nd serve. Winter broke Wallin twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Edward’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion.
Edward has a composed 31-18 win-loss record in 2025, 29-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gengel | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 51 |
| Pts | 63-41 | 200-136 |
| Total Points | 104 | 336 |
| Winners | 24 | 82 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Gengel played 1 match while Winter competed in 3 matches. Winter started his run from the qualifications while Gengel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Gengel has played 4 set(s) less than Winter (2 vs 6). Therefore, Gengel played 34 games less than Winter. Gengel scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Winter bagged 82 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gengel | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 32/55 | 107/151 |
| %1st in | 58% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 82/107 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 30/44 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 68% |
Gengel bagged 3 aces . Winter managed to score 6 aces (2 per match). Gengel won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Winter won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gengel | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 80% | 48% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 4 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Czech quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points. Edward broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gengel | |||
| R1 Bynoe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 63-41 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/55 | 32/55 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Winter | |||||
| Q1 Nefve | Q3 Brumm | R1 Wallin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | 19 | 51 | |
| pts | 67-41 | 63-38 | 70-57 | 200-136 | |
| Total points | 108 | 101 | 127 | 336 | |
| Winners | 28 | 19 | 35 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 30% | 50% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/41 | 25/40 | 51/70 | 107/151 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 63% | 73% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 19/25 | 35/51 | 82/107 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 76% | 69% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/10 | 11/15 | 14/19 | 30/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 73% | 74% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/11 | 2/5 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 45% | 40% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/1 | 5/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 100% | 200% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 5-7 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Micah BraswellBraswell (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Andrew FentyFenty (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominique RollandRolland – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction