Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Petr Bar Biryukov will square off in the 2nd round of the Jinan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.174
Petr Bar Biryukov -> 4.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Petr Bar Biryukov
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Petr Bar Biryukov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
25 - 26win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Chak reached the 2nd round after beating Laslo Djere 7-6(10) 6-2.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Djere (7-610 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 88 points vs Djere’s 69. Lam Coleman Wong was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 62% of his first serves in, winning 76% (38/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Djere 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (157-126). 16-15 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall125-87 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The has a compiled 25-26 win-loss record in 2025, 16-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Jinan Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Petr Bar Biryukov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-29 | 48-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-23 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-20 | 15-9 | 9-9 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-17 | 25-14 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-18 | 3-1 | 2-10 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 304 (career-high), the Russian got to the 2nd round after beating Evan Zhu 6-2 6-4, Linang Xiao 6-2 6-4 and Taro Daniel 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Petr defeated Daniel (7-65 4-6 6-3). During the match Bar Biryukov scored 104 points vs Daniel’s 102. The Russian was very aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about serving, Bar Biryukov scored 14 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Overall, Petr Bar Biryukov was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (53/72) of his 1st serve and 53% (25/47) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Petr broke Daniel twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Bar Biryukov’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Nonthaburi,M15 Astana and M25 Guiyang.
Petr has a composed 43-24 win-loss record in 2025, 43-23 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Jinan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Bar Biryukov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 68 |
| Pts | 88-69 | 229-190 |
| Total Points | 157 | 419 |
| Winners | 38 | 105 |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Bar Biryukov competed in 3 matches. Bar Biryukov started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Petr Bar Biryukov dropped 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 5 set(s) less than Bar Biryukov (2 vs 7). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 47 games less than Bar Biryukov. The scored 38 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Bar Biryukov fired 105 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Bar Biryukov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 135/228 |
| %1st in | 62% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 38/50 | 105/135 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 51/93 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 55% |
Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 6 aces . Bar Biryukov made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Bar Biryukov won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Bar Biryukov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 9/14 |
| % Converted | 44% | 64% |
| Conceded | 9 | 15 |
| Saved | 7 | 12 |
| % Saved | 78% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Russian broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Petr conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Djere | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-610 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 88-69 | 88-69 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 50/81 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 38/50 | 38/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Bar Biryukov | |||||
| Q1 Zhu | Q3 Xiao | R1 Daniel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-65 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 32 | 68 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 62-48 | 104-102 | 229-190 | |
| Total points | 103 | 110 | 206 | 419 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 53 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 47% | 51% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 14 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 10 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 29/52 | 34/57 | 72/119 | 135/228 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 60% | 61% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 29/34 | 53/72 | 105/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 85% | 74% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 12/23 | 25/47 | 51/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 52% | 53% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/5 | 2/3 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 60% | 67% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/3 | 8/10 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 80% | 230% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Jinan Challenger
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (4-6 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Taro DanielDaniel (7-65 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Harold MayotMayot (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Jie CuiCui (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – James McCabeMcCabe (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Fajing SunSun (3-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Laslo DjereDjere (7-610 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell (4-6 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Billy HarrisHarris (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Pavel KotovKotov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Adam WaltonWalton (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (1-0) – H2H and prediction