Mats Rosenkranz and Micah Braswell will face off in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on EVE ZIMMERMAN COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mats Rosenkranz who should win in 3 sets.
Mats Rosenkranz -> 1.75
Micah Braswell -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mats Rosenkranz vs. Micah Braswell
There is no head to head record between Mats Rosenkranz and Micah Braswell since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Mats Rosenkranz
36 - 27win/loss
254
254
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-33 | 12-14 | 5-6 | 23-11 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2024 | 36-23 | 7-4 | 13-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
| 2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 315, the German reached the 2nd round after beating Tristan Mccormick 6-0 6-2.
In the 1st round, Rosenkranz had a good straight sets win against Mccormick (6-0 6-2). During the match, Rosenkranz scored 53 points vs Mccormick’s 30. Mats was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rosenkranz blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mats Rosenkranz conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Rosenkranz put 62% of his first serves in, winning 88% (23/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Mccormick 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Rosenkranz has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (314-289). 11-13 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Rosenkranz has a compiled 64-78 record in the last years on hard.
Rosenkranz’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Oberhaching and M25 Plaisir.
The German has an overall 35-27 win-loss record in 2025, 11-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Mats has never competed in this tournament before.
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-14 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 580, Braswell reached the 2nd round after defeating Oliver Tarvet 4-6 6-2 6-1
.In the 1st round against Tarvet, Braswell recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-1). During the match Braswell scored 86 points vs Tarvet’s 66. Braswell was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Braswell bagged 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Micah Braswell lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Braswell put 69% of his first serves in, winning 65% (31/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Micah broke Tarvet 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Braswell’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Bressuire and M25 Sunderland.
Micah has a compiled 13-6 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosenkranz | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 25 |
| Pts | 53-30 | 86-66 |
| Total Points | 83 | 152 |
| Winners | 23 | 31 |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% |
Both Rosenkranz and Braswell played 1 match. At the moment, Micah Braswell lost 1 set while Mats Rosenkranz hasn’t dropped a set so far. Rosenkranz has played 1 set(s) less than Braswell (2 vs 3). Therefore, Rosenkranz played 11 games less than Braswell. Mats scored 23 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 31 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosenkranz | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 10 |
| 1st in | 26/42 | 48/70 |
| %1st in | 62% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 31/48 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 59% |
Rosenkranz made 6 aces . Braswell bagged 10 aces . Rosenkranz won 88% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosenkranz | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 7/15 |
| % Converted | 56% | 47% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Rosenkranz quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. The American broke his opponent 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Braswell conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rosenkranz | |||
| R1 Mccormick | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 53-30 | 53-30 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 23/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Braswell | |||
| R1 Tarvet | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 86-66 | 86-66 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 48/70 | 48/70 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Roger Pascual FerraPascual Ferra – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (5-7 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Edward WinterWinter – Olle WallinWallin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Darian KingKing (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Tibo ColsonColson (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Evan BynoeBynoe (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominique RollandRolland – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Max WiskandtWiskandt (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Aryan ShahShah (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrew FentyFenty – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Kaylan BigunBigun (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Oliver TarvetTarvet (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Tibo ColsonColson (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Aryan ShahShah (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Darian KingKing (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Max WiskandtWiskandt (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew FentyFenty – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction