Michael Geerts and Charles Broom will play each other in the 2nd round of the Hersonissos 5 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 21. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Geerts who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Geerts is the pick to win this match.
Michael Geerts -> 1.85
Charles Broom -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Geerts vs. Charles Broom
This will be the 2nd time that Michael Geerts and Charles Broom play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Broom (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Broom won 6-4 7-6(6) in the qualifications in the Koblenz Challenger back in 2024.
Michael Geerts
31 - 30win/loss
294
212
WWWWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-34 | 27-15 | 10-14 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-37 | 18-11 | 10-12 | 17-13 | 0-1 | 5-0 |
| 2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 322, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after defeating Ioannis Xilas 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Geerts had a good straight sets win against Xilas (6-4 6-4). During the match, Geerts scored 68 points vs Xilas’s 60. Michael was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Geerts struck 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Michael Geerts lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Geerts put 45% of his first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (19/35) on the 2nd serve. Geerts broke Xilas 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Geerts has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (314-249). 18-12 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Geerts has a composed 125-82 record in the last years on hard.
Michael’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Loule and the Abidjan 2 Challenger.
Michael has an aggregate 31-30 win-loss record in 2025, 18-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Geerts has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
31 - 17win/loss
322
235
LWWWLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40-23 | 34-15 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 375, Charles reached the 2nd round after defeating Oliver Crawford 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the 1st round against Crawford, Broom recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-3). During the match Broom scored 106 points vs Crawford’s 100. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Broom managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 65% of his first serves in, winning 73% (49/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (15/36) on the 2nd serve. Charles broke Crawford 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham,M25 Castelo Branco and M25 Sapporo.
Charles has an aggregate 31-17 win-loss record in 2025, 31-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Geerts | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 31 |
| Pts | 68-60 | 106-100 |
| Total Points | 128 | 206 |
| Winners | 19 | 49 |
| %Winners | 28% | 46% |
Both Geerts and Broom played 1 match. At the moment, Charles Broom conceded 1 set while Michael Geerts hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Geerts has played 1 set(s) less than Broom (2 vs 3). Therefore, Geerts played 11 games less than Broom. Geerts scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Broom scored 49 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Geerts | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 29/64 | 67/103 |
| %1st in | 45% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 49/67 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 15/36 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 42% |
Geerts managed to score 3 aces . Broom scored 6 aces . Geerts won 66% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Geerts | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 83% | 67% |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 63% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Michael broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Michael conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Broom broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Geerts | |||
| R1 Xilas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-60 | 68-60 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 29/64 | 29/64 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 19/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Broom | |||
| R1 Crawford |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 106-100 | 106-100 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 67/103 | 67/103 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 49/67 | 49/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/36 | 15/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWLWWL
LWWWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Hersonissos 5 Challenger
- Niels ViskerVisker – Pavlos TsitsipasTsitsipas (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dennis NovakNovak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Max BasingBasing (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Karan SinghSingh (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Ioannis XilasXilas (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Edas ButvilasButvilas (0-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Federico CinaCina (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – Giles HusseyHussey (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Dimitris SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Mees RottgeringRottgering (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Petros TsitsipasTsitsipas – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (3-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Gilles Arnaud BaillyArnaud Bailly – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Edas ButvilasButvilas (0-6 7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Mees RottgeringRottgering (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Karan SinghSingh (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dennis NovakNovak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Federico CinaCina (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – Giles HusseyHussey (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Max BasingBasing (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Niels ViskerVisker – Pavlos TsitsipasTsitsipas (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Dimitris SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Ioannis XilasXilas (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (5-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Petros TsitsipasTsitsipas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Charles BroomBroom (0-1) – H2H and prediction
