Stefanos Sakellaridis and Kenny de Schepper will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Roanne Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on CENTRAL A.VACHERESSE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kenny de Schepper who should win in 3 sets.
Kenny de Schepper -> 1.84
Stefanos Sakellaridis -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Stefanos Sakellaridis vs. Kenny de Schepper
This will be the 2nd time that Stefanos Sakellaridis and Kenny de Schepper face off. The head to head is 1-0 for de Schepper (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, de Schepper won 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the 2nd round in M15 Monastir back in February 2025.
Stefanos Sakellaridis
45 - 22win/loss
275
275
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-27 | 37-14 | 11-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-29 | 35-25 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-52 | 35-26 | 30-23 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 66-49 | 23-13 | 38-33 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-36 | 5-1 | 29-35 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, Stefanos reached the qualifications after beating Alexis Gautier 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Gautier, The Greek recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Sakellaridis scored 89 points vs Gautier’s 76. Stefanos was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sakellaridis blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Stefanos Sakellaridis was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (35/47) of his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Stefanos broke Gautier 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Sakellaridis has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 54% of his matches (265-222). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sakellaridis has a composed7-7 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Stefanos’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Heraklion.
The Greek has an aggregate 45-22 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roanne Challenger
The Greek has never competed in this tournament before.
Kenny de Schepper
27 - 26win/loss
668
62
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-28 | 8-8 | 8-7 | 10-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-31 | 14-9 | 4-8 | 13-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 638, De Schepper reached the qualifications after defeating Lucas Poullain 3-6 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications against Poullain, Kenny recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-1). During the match de Schepper scored 87 points vs Poullain’s 75. Kenny was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, de Schepper managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kenny de Schepper lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, de Schepper put 77% of his first serves in, winning 69% (42/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. Kenny broke Poullain 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
De Schepper has an overall 27-26 win-loss record in 2025, 10-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roanne Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sakellaridis | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 24 |
| Pts | 89-76 | 87-75 |
| Total Points | 165 | 162 |
| Winners | 35 | 42 |
| %Winners | 39% | 48% |
Both Sakellaridis and de Schepper played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Stefanos Sakellaridis surrendered 1 set, while Kenny de Schepper lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Sakellaridis and de Schepper have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Sakellaridis played 3 games more than de Schepper. Sakellaridis scored 35 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, De Schepper scored 42 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sakellaridis | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 9 |
| 1st in | 47/80 | 61/79 |
| %1st in | 59% | 77% |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 42/61 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 21/33 | 8/18 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 44% |
Sakellaridis bagged 8 aces . de Schepper fired 9 aces . Sakellaridis won 74% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, de Schepper won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sakellaridis | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 30% | 45% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Stefanos broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Greek conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. De Schepper broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. De Schepper conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sakellaridis | |||
| Q1 Gautier | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 89-76 | 89-76 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 47/80 | 47/80 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/33 | 21/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| de Schepper | |||
| Q1 Poullain | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 87-75 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 61/79 | 61/79 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo VoljacquesVoljacques – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction