Luka Mikrut and Sumit Nagal will clash against each other in the quarter of the Braga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luka Mikrut who should win in 3 sets.
Luka Mikrut -> 1.71
Sumit Nagal -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Luka Mikrut vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Luka Mikrut and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Luka Mikrut
48 - 17win/loss
162
159
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 57-20 | 4-3 | 52-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-26 | 5-4 | 31-19 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 5-3 | 28-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 9-2 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239 (career-high), Mikrut reached the quarter after beating Joel Schwaerzler 7-6(3) 6-2 and Dusan Lajovic 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Luka had a good straight sets win against Lajovic (6-3 6-3). During the match, Mikrut scored 65 points vs Lajovic’s 46. The Croatian was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mikrut fired 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Luka Mikrut lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Mikrut put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (21/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the 2nd serve. Mikrut broke Lajovic 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
Mikrut has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (134-82). 45-14 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Mikrut has an aggregate111-66 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Como Challenger where he defeated Duje Ajdukovic in the final 6-3 7-5.
The Croatian has a compiled 48-17 win-loss record in 2025, 45-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braga Challenger
Mikrut has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
30 - 25win/loss
276
68
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 2-3 | 30-23 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289, Nagal reached the quarter after beating Sebastian Fanselow 6-4 6-0, Enrico Dalla Valle 6-3 4-6 6-0, Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-1 6-4 and Roberto Carballes Baena 5-7 4-1 ret..
In the 2nd round against Carballes Baena, Nagal had a free pass after Carballes Baena retired on a 5-7 4-1 . scoreline.
Sumit’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Trieste Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
Sumit has a composed 30-25 win-loss record in 2025, 26-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mikrut | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 75 |
| Pts | 141-107 | 269-206 |
| Total Points | 248 | 475 |
| Winners | 48 | 109 |
| %Winners | 34% | 41% |
Mikrut played 2 matches while Nagal competed in 4 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while Mikrut had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Sumit Nagal conceded 2 sets while Luka Mikrut hasn’t lost a set so far. Mikrut has played 6 set(s) less than Nagal (4 vs 10). Therefore, Mikrut played 36 games less than Nagal. The Croatian scored 48 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian blasted 109 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mikrut | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 1.8 |
| 1st in | 65/119 | 156/228 |
| %1st in | 55% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 48/65 | 109/156 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 30/54 | 41/72 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Mikrut managed to score 7 aces (3.5 per match). Nagal recorded 7 aces (1.8 per match). Mikrut won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mikrut | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 18 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 18/46 |
| % Converted | 64% | 39% |
| Conceded | 9 | 25 |
| Saved | 5 | 17 |
| % Saved | 56% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 8 |
Mikrut broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. The Croatian surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponents 18 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mikrut | ||||
| R1 Schwaerzler | R2 Lajovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
| pts | 76-61 | 65-46 | 141-107 | |
| Total points | 137 | 111 | 248 | |
| Winners | 27 | 21 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 32/67 | 33/52 | 65/119 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 63% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 21/33 | 48/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 64% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 13/19 | 30/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 68% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/9 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 56% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 0/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 0% | 36% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Nagal | ||||||
| Q1 Fanselow | Q3 Dalla Valle | R1 Ferreira Silva | R2 Carballes Baena | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | 6-1 6-4 | 5-7 4-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 | 17 | 17 | 75 | |
| pts | 59-36 | 93-72 | 61-44 | 56-54 | 269-206 | |
| Total points | 95 | 165 | 105 | 110 | 475 | |
| Winners | 20 | 44 | 26 | 19 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 47% | 43% | 34% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 26/37 | 63/83 | 40/55 | 27/53 | 156/228 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 76% | 73% | 51% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 44/63 | 26/40 | 19/27 | 109/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 70% | 65% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 10/20 | 9/15 | 14/26 | 41/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 50% | 60% | 54% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 18 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/15 | 5/9 | 2/10 | 18/46 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 40% | 56% | 20% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 25 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 10/13 | 3/5 | 4/6 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 77% | 60% | 67% | 102% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tennis Scores in Braga Challenger
- Alexander Donski/Stefan LatinovicDonski/Stefan Latinovic – Inigo Cervantes/Denys MolchanovCervantes/Denys Molchanov (7-65 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mircea-Alexandru Jecan/Bogdan PavelJecan/Bogdan Pavel – Jiri Barnat/Filip DudaBarnat/Filip Duda (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction