Johannus Monday and Tyler Zink will face off in the 2^nd round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on BAKER MCKENZIE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Johannus Monday who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Johannus Monday is the pick to win this match.
Johannus Monday -> 1.57
Tyler Zink -> 2.28

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Johannus Monday vs. Tyler Zink

This will be the 2^nd time that Johannus Monday and Tyler Zink fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Monday (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they squared off, Monday won 6-2 6-3 in the final in M25 Louisville back in 2024.

Johannus Monday

Ranked no. 229, Monday reached the 2^nd round after defeating Alex Rybakov 6-3 4-6 6-2.

In the 1^st round, Johannus defeated Rybakov (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match, Monday scored 93 points vs Rybakov’s 77. Monday was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.

Regarding the service games, Monday scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Johannus Monday was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (38/50) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Rybakov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).

Monday has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (95-56). 19-12 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Monday has an aggregate63-29 match record in the last 6 years on hard.

Johannus’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Sunderland and M25 Bakersfield.

The Brit has an aggregate 31-21 win-loss record in 2025, 19-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Tiburon Challenger

Tyler Zink

Ranked no. 347, Tyler got to the 2^nd round after beating Micah Braswell 6-1 6-4.

In the 1^st round, Zink had a good straight sets win against Braswell (6-1 6-4). During the match Zink scored 63 points vs Braswell’s 42. The American was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.

About the serving games, Zink struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tyler Zink conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 57% of his first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. Tyler broke Braswell 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).

The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Orange Park.

The American has an aggregate 32-25 win-loss record in 2025, 9-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Monday	Zink
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	2
Tot Games	27	17
Pts	93-77	63-42
Total Points	170	105
Winners	38	29
%Winners	41%	46%

Both Monday and Zink played 1 match. At the moment, Johannus Monday conceded 1 set while Tyler Zink hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Monday has played 1 set more than Zink (3 vs 2). Therefore, Monday played 10 games more than Zink. Johannus scored 38 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Tyler scored 29 winners (46%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Monday	Zink
Aces	1	6
Avg per match	1	6
1st in	50/80	34/60
%1st in	63%	57%
1st pts	38/50	29/34
%1st pts	76%	85%
2nd pts	17/30	13/26
%2nd pts	57%	50%

Monday recorded 1 ace . Zink also made 6 aces . Monday won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Monday	Zink
Won	4	3
Converted	4/10	3/4
% Converted	40%	75%
Conceded	10	5
Saved	9	5
% Saved	90%	100%
Times Broken	1	0

Johannus broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. Tyler broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.

Monday
	R1 Rybakov	Total
Score	6-3 4-6 6-2
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	27	27
pts	93-77	93-77
Total points	170	170
Winners	38	38
%Winners	41%	41%
SERVE
Aces	1	1
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	50/80	50/80
% 1st in	63%	63%
1st pts	38/50	38/50
% 1st pts	76%	76%
2nd pts	17/30	17/30
% 2nd pts	57%	57%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/10	4/10
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	10	10
Saved	9/10	9
Saved %	90%	90%
Times Broken	1	1

Zink
	R1 Braswell	Total
Score	6-1 6-4
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	17
pts	63-42	63-42
Total points	105	105
Winners	29	29
%Winners	46%	46%
SERVE
Aces	6	6
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	34/60	34/60
% 1st in	57%	57%
1st pts	29/34	29/34
% 1st pts	85%	85%
2nd pts	13/26	13/26
% 2nd pts	50%	50%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/4	3/4
Converted %	75%	75%
Conceded	5	5
Saved	5/5	5
Saved %	100%	100%
Times Broken	0	0

Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger

• Rafael JodarJodar – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Nicolas MejiaMejia – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (2-6 6-4 7-6⁵) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Dmitry PopkoPopko – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Alfredo PerezPerez (4-6 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
• Benjamin HassanHassan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Tyler ZinkZink – (0-1) – H2H and prediction