Roberto Carballes Baena and Sumit Nagal will play each other in the 2nd round of the Braga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roberto Carballes Baena who should win in 3 sets.
Roberto Carballes Baena -> 1.49
Sumit Nagal -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Roberto Carballes Baena vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Roberto Carballes Baena and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Roberto Carballes Baena
19 - 22win/loss
133
49
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-24 | 7-10 | 11-12 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-31 | 10-12 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-29 | 3-8 | 19-14 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-33 | 3-8 | 41-23 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-30 | 3-5 | 33-20 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 113, Roberto reached the 2nd round after defeating Tiago Torres 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, Roberto had a good straight sets win against Torres (6-1 6-3). During the match, Carballes Baena scored 68 points vs Torres’s 44. Roberto was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Carballes Baena scored just 1 ace and he committed only 2 double faults. Roberto Carballes Baena lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Carballes Baena put 64% of his first serves in, winning 68% (19/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Torres 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Carballes Baena has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (355-292). 11-11 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Carballes Baena has an aggregate 292-192 match record in the last years on clay.
The Spaniard’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Marrakech and the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger.
Roberto has a compiled 19-22 win-loss record in 2025, 11-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braga Challenger
Roberto has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
29 - 25win/loss
273
68
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 2-3 | 30-23 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289, Sumit reached the 2nd round after beating Sebastian Fanselow 6-4 6-0, Enrico Dalla Valle 6-3 4-6 6-0 and Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Ferreira Silva (6-1 6-4). During the match Nagal scored 61 points vs Ferreira Silva’s 44. The Indian was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 73% of his first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the 2nd serve. Sumit broke Ferreira Silva 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Indian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Trieste Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
Nagal has a composed 29-25 win-loss record in 2025, 25-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Carballes Baena | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 58 |
| Pts | 68-44 | 213-152 |
| Total Points | 112 | 365 |
| Winners | 19 | 90 |
| %Winners | 28% | 42% |
Carballes Baena played 1 match while Nagal competed in 3 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while Carballes Baena had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Sumit Nagal conceded 1 set while Roberto Carballes Baena hasn’t lost a set so far. Carballes Baena has played 5 set(s) less than Nagal (2 vs 7). Therefore, Carballes Baena played 42 games less than Nagal. Carballes Baena scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal recorded 90 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Carballes Baena | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 28/44 | 129/175 |
| %1st in | 64% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 90/129 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 27/46 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 59% |
Carballes Baena fired 1 ace . Nagal also scored 5 aces (1.7 per match). Carballes Baena won 68% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Carballes Baena | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 16 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 16/36 |
| % Converted | 40% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 19 |
| Saved | 1 | 13 |
| % Saved | 33% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Carballes Baena lost his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponents 16 times with a 44% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Carballes Baena | |||
| R1 Torres | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 68-44 | 68-44 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/44 | 28/44 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nagal | |||||
| Q1 Fanselow | Q3 Dalla Valle | R1 Ferreira Silva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 | 17 | 58 | |
| pts | 59-36 | 93-72 | 61-44 | 213-152 | |
| Total points | 95 | 165 | 105 | 365 | |
| Winners | 20 | 44 | 26 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 47% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 26/37 | 63/83 | 40/55 | 129/175 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 76% | 73% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 44/63 | 26/40 | 90/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 70% | 65% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 10/20 | 9/15 | 27/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 50% | 60% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/15 | 5/9 | 16/36 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 40% | 56% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 13 | 5 | 19 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 10/13 | 3/5 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 77% | 60% | 137% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Braga Challenger
- Henri SquireSquire – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-77 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes IngildsenIngildsen – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Jay ClarkeClarke (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Tiago TorresTorres (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (7-5 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Pedro AraujoAraujo (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Francisco RochaRocha (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Elias YmerYmer (1-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Max HoukesHoukes (5-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Pedro AraujoAraujo (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Max HoukesHoukes (5-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-7(7) 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes IngildsenIngildsen – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Jay ClarkeClarke (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Tiago TorresTorres (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johannes IngildsenIngildsen – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lilian MarmousezMarmousez – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction