Jannik Sinner and Learner Tien will play each other in the final of the China Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on CAPITAL GROUP DIAMOND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jannik Sinner who should win in 2 sets.
Jannik Sinner -> 1.034
Learner Tien -> 11.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jannik Sinner vs. Learner Tien
There is no head to head record
between Jannik Sinner and Learner Tien since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.Jannik Sinner
41 - 5win/loss
2
1
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 58-6 | 24-3 | 11-2 | 15-0 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 73-8 | 40-5 | 11-2 | 13-0 | 9-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 64-15 | 28-7 | 8-3 | 20-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-16 | 21-6 | 15-4 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-22 | 22-8 | 10-6 | 17-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 2, the Italian reached the final after defeating Marin Cilic 6-2 6-2, Terence Atmane 6-4 5-7 6-0, Fabian Marozsan 6-1 7-5 and Alex De Minaur 6-3 4-6 6-2.
In the semifinal, The Italian defeated De Minaur (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match, Sinner scored 97 points vs De Minaur’s 76. Sinner was very aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sinner struck 7 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Jannik Sinner lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Sinner put 64% of his first serves in, winning 82% (50/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (16/35) on the 2nd serve. Jannik broke De Minaur 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sinner has dropped 2 set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Sinner has a fantastic record in the last 8 years having won 75% of his matches (387-126). 22-2 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sinner has an aggregate160-48 record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title at the Australian Open where he beat Alexander Zverev in the final 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 and at the Wimbledon where he overcame Carlos Alcaraz in the final 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.
The Italian has an aggregate 41-5 win-loss record in 2025, 22-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Learner Tien
30 - 22win/loss
28
28
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-25 | 26-13 | 3-7 | 6-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-14 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 52, Learner reached the final after defeating Francisco Cerundolo 4-6 6-3 6-4, Flavio Cobolli 6-3 6-2, Lorenzo Musetti 4-6 6-3 3-0 ret. and Daniil Medvedev 5-7 7-5 4-0 ret..
In the semifinal against Medvedev, Tien had a free pass after Medvedev retired on a 5-7 7-5 4-0 . scoreline.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Beijing.
Tien has an overall 30-22 win-loss record in 2025, 23-11 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in Beijing
Tien has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 13 |
| Tot Games | 90 | 96 |
| Pts | 317-237 | 323-287 |
| Total Points | 554 | 610 |
| Winners | 138 | 133 |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% |
Both Sinner and Tien played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jannik Sinner dropped 2 sets, while Learner Tien lost 3 sets. Sinner has played 3 set(s) less than Tien (10 vs 13). Therefore, Sinner played 6 games less than Tien. Jannik scored 138 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 133 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 185/288 | 218/333 |
| %1st in | 64% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 138/185 | 133/218 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 53/103 | 65/115 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Sinner made 20 aces (5 per match). Tien struck 6 aces (1.5 per match). Sinner won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Tien won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 18 | 20 |
| Converted | 18/39 | 20/41 |
| % Converted | 46% | 49% |
| Conceded | 24 | 28 |
| Saved | 19 | 16 |
| % Saved | 79% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 12 |
Sinner broke his opponents 18 times with a 46% conversion rate. Jannik conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Learner broke his opponents 20 times with a 49% conversion rate. Learner conceded his serve 12 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sinner | ||||||
| R1 Cilic | R2 Atmane | 1/4 Marozsan | 1/2 De Minaur | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 28 | 19 | 27 | 90 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 95-80 | 63-43 | 97-76 | 317-237 | |
| Total points | 100 | 175 | 106 | 173 | 554 | |
| Winners | 27 | 40 | 21 | 50 | 138 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 33% | 52% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/47 | 58/92 | 30/53 | 61/96 | 185/288 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 63% | 57% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 40/58 | 21/30 | 50/61 | 138/185 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 69% | 70% | 82% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 16/34 | 14/23 | 16/35 | 53/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 47% | 61% | 46% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 18 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 6/11 | 5/11 | 3/7 | 18/39 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 55% | 45% | 43% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 | 2 | 12 | 24 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 6/9 | 1/2 | 11/12 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 50% | 92% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| Tien | ||||||
| R1 Cerundolo | R2 Cobolli | 1/4 Musetti | 1/2 Medvedev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | 5-7 7-5 4-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 17 | 22 | 28 | 96 | |
| pts | 94-88 | 63-45 | 72-65 | 94-89 | 323-287 | |
| Total points | 182 | 108 | 137 | 183 | 610 | |
| Winners | 36 | 24 | 37 | 36 | 133 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | 51% | 38% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 56/93 | 36/59 | 56/78 | 70/103 | 218/333 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 61% | 72% | 68% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 36/56 | 24/36 | 37/56 | 36/70 | 133/218 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 67% | 66% | 51% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/37 | 12/23 | 14/22 | 20/33 | 65/115 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 52% | 64% | 61% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 20 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/9 | 3/8 | 7/16 | 20/41 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 56% | 38% | 44% | 49% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 28 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3/5 | 5/6 | 5/10 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 60% | 83% | 50% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jannik SinnerSinner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction