Carlos Maria Zarate and Santiago De La Fuente will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Antofagasta Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 8. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Santiago De La Fuente who should win in 2 sets.
Santiago De La Fuente -> 1.24
Carlos Maria Zarate -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Carlos Maria Zarate vs. Santiago De La Fuente
This will be the 2nd time that Carlos Maria Zarate and Santiago De La Fuente square off. The head to head is 1-0 for De La Fuente (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, De La Fuente won 6-2 6-4 in the 1st round in M15 Salta back in July 2025.
Carlos Maria Zarate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-30 | 0-0 | 47-29 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-18 | 5-8 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Argentine reached the qualifications after defeating Guido Ivan Justo 6-4 1-6 7-6(1).
In the qualifications, Maria Zarate defeated Ivan Justo (6-4 1-6 7-61).During the match, Maria Zarate scored less points (4) than Ivan Justo. In fact, the world no. won 109 points vs Ivan Justo’s. That means that Maria Zarate was more focused during the important points. Carlos was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Maria Zarate scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Carlos Maria Zarate lost the serve 5 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Maria Zarate put 57% of his first serves in, winning 59% (45/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (28/57) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Ivan Justo 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Maria Zarate has a winning record in the last 2 years having won 53% of his matches (48-42). 33-23 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Maria Zarate has a composed43-33 win-loss record in the last 2 years on clay.
Maria Zarate’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 San Salvador de Jujuy and M15 Santiago.
The Argentine has a compiled 33-24 win-loss record in 2025, 33-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antofagasta Challenger
Carlos has never competed in this tournament before.
Santiago De La Fuente
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-23 | 0-0 | 28-22 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 0-0 | 17-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-22 | 0-1 | 25-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 654 (career-high), the Argentine got to the qualifications after beating Juan Sebastian Osorio 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, De La Fuente had a good straight sets win against Sebastian Osorio (6-4 6-1). During the match De La Fuente scored 65 points vs Sebastian Osorio’s 47. De La Fuente was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, De La Fuente bagged 2 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Santiago De La Fuente conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, De La Fuente put 78% of his first serves in, winning 75% (30/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (5/11) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Sebastian Osorio 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Santiago’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Salta.
The Argentine has an aggregate 25-16 win-loss record in 2025, 23-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Maria Zarate | De La Fuente |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 |
| Pts | 109-113 | 65-47 |
| Total Points | 222 | 112 |
| Winners | 45 | 30 |
| %Winners | 41% | 46% |
Both Maria Zarate and De La Fuente played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Carlos Maria Zarate lost 1 set while Santiago De La Fuente hasn’t conceded a set so far. Maria Zarate has played 1 set more than De La Fuente (3 vs 2). Therefore, Maria Zarate played 13 games more than De La Fuente. The Argentine scored 45 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, De La Fuente managed to score 30 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Maria Zarate | De La Fuente |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 76/133 | 40/51 |
| %1st in | 57% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 45/76 | 30/40 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 28/57 | 5/11 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 45% |
Maria Zarate bagged 1 ace . De La Fuente also blasted 2 aces . Maria Zarate won 59% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, De La Fuente won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Maria Zarate | De La Fuente |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 17 | 2 |
| Saved | 12 | 2 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Santiago broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. De La Fuente was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Maria Zarate | |||
| Q1 Ivan Justo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 109-113 | 109-113 | |
| Total points | 222 | 222 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 76/133 | 76/133 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 45/76 | 45/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 12/17 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| De La Fuente | |||
| Q1 Sebastian Osorio | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/51 | 40/51 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction