Bor Artnak and Edward Winter will square off in the qualifications of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on BAKER MCKENZIE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edward Winter who should win in 3 sets.
Edward Winter -> 1.61
Bor Artnak -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bor Artnak vs. Edward Winter
There is no head to head record between Bor Artnak and Edward Winter since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Bor Artnak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-19 | 7-5 | 24-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 40-26 | 10-11 | 29-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-33 | 16-7 | 28-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-12 | 9-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 489, Bor got to the qualifications after beating Joshua Sheehy 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Slovenian defeated Sheehy (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Artnak scored 96 points vs Sheehy’s 88. The Slovenian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Artnak recorded 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Bor Artnak lost the serve 3 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Artnak put 68% of his first serves in, winning 68% (46/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. Bor broke Sheehy 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Artnak has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (135-88). 5-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Artnak has a composed40-27 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Artnak’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Store and M25 Brazzaville.
Artnak has an overall 29-16 win-loss record in 2025, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Edward Winter
28 - 18win/loss
465
454
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-21 | 32-16 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-19 | 25-17 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-20 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 10-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 533, Edward reached the qualifications after defeating Maxwell Mckennon 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Winter had a good straight sets win against Mckennon (6-4 6-4). During the match Winter scored 68 points vs Mckennon’s 60. Winter was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Winter bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Edward Winter was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Winter broke Mckennon twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion.
Edward has an aggregate 28-17 win-loss record in 2025, 26-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Edward has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Artnak | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 20 |
| Pts | 96-88 | 68-60 |
| Total Points | 184 | 128 |
| Winners | 46 | 34 |
| %Winners | 48% | 50% |
Both Artnak and Winter played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Bor Artnak conceded 1 set while Edward Winter hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Artnak has played 1 set more than Winter (3 vs 2). Therefore, Artnak played 7 games more than Winter. Artnak scored 46 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Winter recorded 34 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Artnak | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 68/100 | 48/68 |
| %1st in | 68% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 46/68 | 34/48 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Artnak managed to score 3 aces . Winter scored 3 aces . Artnak won 68% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Winter won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Artnak | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 29% | 40% |
| Conceded | 15 | 3 |
| Saved | 12 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Artnak broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. The Slovenian dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Australian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Artnak | |||
| Q1 Sheehy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 96-88 | 96-88 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 68/100 | 68/100 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 46/68 | 46/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 16/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 12/15 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Winter | |||
| Q1 Mckennon | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-60 | 68-60 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 48/68 | 48/68 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel MasurMasur – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renta TokudaTokuda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Marek GengelGengel (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Tibo ColsonColson (0-0) – H2H and prediction