Henri Squire and Filippo Romano will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Braga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Squire who should win in 2 sets.
Henri Squire -> 1.146
Filippo Romano -> 4.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Henri Squire vs. Filippo Romano
There is no head to head record between Henri Squire and Filippo Romano since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Henri Squire
32 - 27win/loss
277
169
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 1-3 | 31-21 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
Ranked no. 331, Henri got to the qualifications after defeating John Sperle 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Squire had a good straight sets win against Sperle (6-4 6-1). During the match, Squire scored 62 points vs Sperle’s 42. Squire was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Squire scored 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Henri Squire conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 65% of his first serves in, win 88% (29/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Henri broke Sperle 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Squire has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 56% of his matches (204-158). 24-19 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Squire has an aggregate111-90 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Henri’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Kramsach,M25 Koksijde and the Augsburg Challenger.
Squire has an aggregate 31-27 win-loss record in 2025, 24-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braga Challenger
Filippo Romano
27 - 24win/loss
578
561
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-29 | 2-5 | 25-20 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 1-1 | 9-19 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 8-2 |
| 2023 | 9-13 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 602, Filippo got to the qualifications after beating Tiago Cacao 7-6(1) 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Cacao (7-61 7-64). During the match Romano scored 102 points vs Cacao’s 94. Romano was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Romano scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Filippo Romano was pretty effective on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 61% (23/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Filippo broke Cacao twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Romano’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15+H Bagnoles de l’Orne and M25 Cervia.
Filippo has an aggregate 27-23 win-loss record in 2025, 25-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Squire | Romano |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 |
| Pts | 62-42 | 102-94 |
| Total Points | 104 | 196 |
| Winners | 29 | 34 |
| %Winners | 47% | 33% |
Both Squire and Romano played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Squire and Romano have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Squire played 9 games less than Romano. The German scored 29 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Filippo scored 34 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Squire | Romano |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1 |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 48/86 |
| %1st in | 65% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 34/48 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 23/38 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 61% |
Squire struck 8 aces . Romano struck 1 ace . Squire won 88% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Romano won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Squire | Romano |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 2/10 |
| % Converted | 60% | 20% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Squire was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Romano broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Romano conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Squire | |||
| Q1 Sperle | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 29/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Romano | |||
| Q1 Cacao | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 102-94 | 102-94 | |
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 48/86 | 48/86 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Tiago TorresTorres (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Johannes IngildsenIngildsen – Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan LatinovicLatinovic – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco RochaRocha – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (0-0) – H2H and prediction