Martin Landaluce and Mark Lajal will play each other in the semifinal of the Orleans Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 9:30 pm on CENTRAL ARENA. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Landaluce who should win in 3 sets.
Martin Landaluce -> 1.72
Mark Lajal -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Landaluce vs. Mark Lajal
There is no head to head record between Martin Landaluce and Mark Lajal since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Martin Landaluce
31 - 26win/loss
131
110
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-29 | 18-11 | 6-10 | 5-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-24 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the Spaniard reached the semifinal after defeating Dominic Stricker 6-2 6-2, Mae Malige 6-4 6-4 and Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, Martin had a good straight sets win against Budkov Kjaer (6-4 6-4). During the match, Landaluce scored 75 points vs Budkov Kjaer’s 62. Landaluce was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Landaluce struck 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Martin Landaluce lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Landaluce put 54% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Martin broke Budkov Kjaer 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Landaluce hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Landaluce has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 55% of his matches (98-79). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Landaluce has an overall9-8 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Landaluce’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger,the Prague Challenger and the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
The Spaniard has a composed 30-26 win-loss record in 2025, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Mark Lajal
39 - 20win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 14-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145 (career-high), Mark got to the semifinal after defeating Viktor Durasovic 6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(5), Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-2 and Remy Bertola 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the quarter, Mark defeated Bertola (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match Lajal scored 96 points vs Bertola’s 85. The Estonian was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Lajal managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Mark Lajal was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (38/52) of his 1st serve and 58% (22/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Mark broke Bertola 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lajal has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he beat Andres Martin in the final 6-7(7) 7-5 7-6(9).
Lajal has a composed 39-19 win-loss record in 2025, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Landaluce | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 56 | 81 |
| Pts | 201-161 | 281-242 |
| Total Points | 362 | 523 |
| Winners | 71 | 129 |
| %Winners | 35% | 46% |
Both Landaluce and Lajal played 3 matches. At the moment, Mark Lajal surrendered 2 sets while Martin Landaluce hasn’t dropped a set so far. Landaluce has played 2 set(s) less than Lajal (6 vs 8). Therefore, Landaluce played 25 games less than Lajal. The Spaniard scored 71 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Mark struck 129 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Landaluce | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 3.3 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 94/175 | 163/266 |
| %1st in | 54% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 71/94 | 129/163 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 46/81 | 54/103 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 52% |
Landaluce struck 10 aces (3.3 per match). Lajal fired 25 aces (8.3 per match). Landaluce won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Landaluce | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 9 |
| Converted | 11/23 | 9/23 |
| % Converted | 48% | 39% |
| Conceded | 10 | 23 |
| Saved | 7 | 19 |
| % Saved | 70% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Landaluce broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Martin dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Mark broke his opponents 9 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Estonian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Landaluce | |||||
| R1 Stricker | R2 Malige | 1/4 Budkov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 20 | 56 | |
| pts | 54-37 | 72-62 | 75-62 | 201-161 | |
| Total points | 91 | 134 | 137 | 362 | |
| Winners | 20 | 22 | 29 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 31% | 39% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 25/46 | 30/57 | 39/72 | 94/175 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 53% | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 22/30 | 29/39 | 71/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 73% | 74% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 20/27 | 16/33 | 46/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 74% | 48% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 2/8 | 4/8 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 25% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/2 | 5/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 100% | 71% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Lajal | |||||
| R1 Durasovic | R2 Rodesch | 1/4 Bertola | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-73 7-65 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 18 | 28 | 81 | |
| pts | 120-110 | 65-47 | 96-85 | 281-242 | |
| Total points | 230 | 112 | 181 | 523 | |
| Winners | 62 | 29 | 38 | 129 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 45% | 40% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | 7 | 5 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 76/128 | 35/48 | 52/90 | 163/266 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 73% | 58% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 62/76 | 29/35 | 38/52 | 129/163 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 83% | 73% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/52 | 6/13 | 22/38 | 54/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 46% | 58% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 4/7 | 3/10 | 9/23 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 57% | 30% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 1 | 9 | 23 | |
| Saved | 12/13 | 0/1 | 7/9 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 92% | 0% | 78% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Orleans Challenger
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Remy BertolaBertola (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Clement Chidekh/Luca SanchezChidekh/Luca Sanchez – Milos Karol/Lukas KleinKarol/Lukas Klein (3-6 7-68 10-2) – See score progression