Jakub Mensik and Arthur Cazaux will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the China Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 8:30 pm on CAPITAL GROUP DIAMOND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 2 sets.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.38
Arthur Cazaux -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jakub Mensik vs. Arthur Cazaux
This will be the 2nd time that Jakub Mensik and Arthur Cazaux face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Cazaux (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Cazaux won 6-3 6-0 in the 2nd round in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger back in 2023.
Jakub Mensik
33 - 20win/loss
19
16
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-22 | 22-12 | 6-5 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-27 | 26-12 | 6-4 | 7-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 10-6 | 17-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-16 | 18-4 | 17-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 19, Jakub reached the 2nd round after beating Miomir Kecmanovic 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Kecmanovic (7-5 6-4). During the match, Mensik scored 84 points vs Kecmanovic’s 79. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mensik scored 10 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jakub Mensik lost the serve 3 times and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Mensik put 47% of his first serves in, winning 76% (31/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (20/47) on the 2nd serve. Jakub broke Kecmanovic 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Mensik has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (149-90). 21-10 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Mensik has a compiled75-32 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title in Miami where he overcame Novak Djokovic in the final 7-6(4) 7-6(4).
Jakub has an overall 33-20 win-loss record in 2025, 21-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Arthur Cazaux
25 - 19win/loss
67
58
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-24 | 18-13 | 8-5 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-24 | 25-15 | 0-2 | 5-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-29 | 31-13 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-14 | 14-3 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 16-4 | 22-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 80, Arthur got to the 2nd round after defeating Chak Lam Coleman Wong 4-6 6-2 7-6(5), Quentin Halys 4-6 5-1 ret. and Juncheng Shang 0-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
In the 1st round against Shang, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 7-65 7-5).During the match Cazaux scored less points (12) than Shang. In fact, the world no. 19 won 91 points vs Shang’s. That means that Cazaux was more focused during the important points. Arthur was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Cazaux bagged 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Arthur Cazaux lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Cazaux put 56% of his first serves in, winning 66% (41/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Cazaux was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Shang twice.
Cazaux’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Kitzbuhel.
Cazaux has a compiled 25-19 win-loss record in 2025, 12-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Cazaux has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mensik | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 78 |
| Pts | 84-79 | 229-238 |
| Total Points | 163 | 467 |
| Winners | 31 | 106 |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% |
Mensik played 1 match while Cazaux competed in 3 matches. Cazaux started his run from the qualifications while Mensik had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Arthur Cazaux dropped 3 sets while Jakub Mensik hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mensik has played 7 set(s) less than Cazaux (2 vs 9). Therefore, Mensik played 56 games less than Cazaux. Mensik scored 31 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Arthur recorded 106 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mensik | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 41/88 | 148/248 |
| %1st in | 47% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 106/148 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 20/47 | 51/100 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 51% |
Mensik made 10 aces . Cazaux bagged 22 aces (7.3 per match). Mensik won 76% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Cazaux won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mensik | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 8/9 |
| % Converted | 63% | 89% |
| Conceded | 17 | 18 |
| Saved | 14 | 10 |
| % Saved | 82% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 8 |
Jakub broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Mensik lost his serve 3 times and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 8 times with a 89% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mensik | |||
| R1 Kecmanovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 84-79 | 84-79 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 41/88 | 41/88 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/47 | 20/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 14/17 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Cazaux | |||||
| Q1 Lam Coleman Wong | Q3 Halys | R1 Shang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 7-65 | 4-6 5-1 ret. | 0-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 16 | 31 | 78 | |
| pts | 94-92 | 44-43 | 91-103 | 229-238 | |
| Total points | 186 | 87 | 194 | 467 | |
| Winners | 43 | 22 | 41 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 50% | 45% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 8 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 61/93 | 25/45 | 62/110 | 148/248 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 56% | 56% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 22/25 | 41/62 | 106/148 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 88% | 66% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 9/20 | 24/48 | 51/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 45% | 50% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 8/9 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 | 12 | 18 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 0/1 | 8/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 0% | 67% | 107% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
Tennis Scores in Beijing
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Benjamin BonziBonzi (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Romain Arneodo/Sander GilleArneodo/Sander Gille (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu Yunchaokete/Cameron NorrieYunchaokete/Cameron Norrie – Marcelo Melo/Alexander ZverevMelo/Alexander Zverev (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Marin CilicCilic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction