Alex De Minaur and Arthur Rinderknech will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the China Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:30 pm on LOTUS. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alex De Minaur who should win in 2 sets.
Alex De Minaur -> 1.115
Arthur Rinderknech -> 6.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alex De Minaur vs. Arthur Rinderknech
There is no head to head record between Alex De Minaur and Arthur Rinderknech since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Alex De Minaur
45 - 17win/loss
7
6
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-24 | 30-11 | 10-5 | 13-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-21 | 19-6 | 10-5 | 11-9 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 26-12 | 4-5 | 10-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-25 | 19-10 | 9-6 | 12-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-25 | 10-10 | 4-5 | 3-7 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 8, De Minaur got to the 2nd round after defeating Bu Yunchaokete 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Yunchaokete (6-4 6-0). During the match, De Minaur scored 63 points vs Yunchaokete’s 45. De Minaur was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Minaur recorded 10 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Alex De Minaur was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Yunchaokete 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
De Minaur has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (404-222). 25-9 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, De Minaur has an aggregate 196-95 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title in Washington where he overcame Alejandro Davidovich Fokina in the final 5-7 6-1 7-6(3).
Alex has an aggregate 45-17 win-loss record in 2025, 25-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Arthur Rinderknech
25 - 30win/loss
29
27
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-35 | 14-15 | 9-10 | 2-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-33 | 16-13 | 6-7 | 12-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-30 | 5-9 | 10-6 | 8-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-23 | 18-11 | 6-4 | 12-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-30 | 3-3 | 18-10 | 26-15 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 54, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Nishesh Basavareddy 6-4 6-4, David Goffin 6-3 6-2 and David Goffin 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Arthur defeated Goffin (6-4 3-6 6-4).During the match Rinderknech scored less points (3) than Goffin. In fact, the world no. 8 won 86 points vs Goffin’s. That means that Rinderknech was more focused during the important points. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Rinderknech bagged 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Arthur Rinderknech was very efficient on serve to win 73% (38/52) of his 1st serve and 54% (26/48) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Rinderknech broke Goffin 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The French player best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Kitzbuhel.
Rinderknech has a compiled 25-30 win-loss record in 2025, 8-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Minaur | Rinderknech |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 49 |
| Pts | 63-45 | 149-130 |
| Total Points | 108 | 279 |
| Winners | 26 | 66 |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% |
De Minaur played 1 match while Rinderknech competed in 2 matches. Rinderknech started his run from the qualifications while De Minaur had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Arthur Rinderknech dropped 1 set while Alex De Minaur hasn’t surrendered a set so far. De Minaur has played 3 set(s) less than Rinderknech (2 vs 5). Therefore, De Minaur played 33 games less than Rinderknech. The Australian scored 26 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Arthur bagged 66 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Minaur | Rinderknech |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 30 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 15 |
| 1st in | 34/51 | 81/143 |
| %1st in | 67% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 66/81 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 38/62 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 61% |
De Minaur fired 10 aces . Rinderknech blasted 30 aces (15 per match). De Minaur won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Rinderknech won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Minaur | Rinderknech |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 36% | 56% |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Australian quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Rinderknech broke his opponents 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Rinderknech conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Minaur | |||
| R1 Yunchaokete | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-45 | 63-45 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Rinderknech | |||||
| Q1 Basavareddy | Q3 Goffin | R1 Goffin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 | 29 | 66 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 89-86 | 86-89 | 238-216 | |
| Total points | 104 | 175 | 175 | 454 | |
| Winners | 28 | 35 | 38 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 39% | 44% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 18 | 9 | 12 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 29/43 | 44/75 | 52/100 | 125/218 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 59% | 52% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/29 | 35/44 | 38/52 | 101/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 97% | 80% | 73% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/14 | 18/31 | 26/48 | 56/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 58% | 54% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/9 | 3/4 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 22% | 75% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/4 | 7/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 25% | 78% | 103% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Beijing
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu Yunchaokete/Cameron NorrieYunchaokete/Cameron Norrie – Marcelo Melo/Alexander ZverevMelo/Alexander Zverev (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Marin CilicCilic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Benjamin BonziBonzi (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Romain Arneodo/Sander GilleArneodo/Sander Gille (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction