Jannik Sinner and Terence Atmane will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the China Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CAPITAL GROUP DIAMOND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jannik Sinner who should win in 2 sets.
Jannik Sinner -> 1.055
Terence Atmane -> 9.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jannik Sinner vs. Terence Atmane
This will be the 2nd time that Jannik Sinner and Terence Atmane square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sinner (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Sinner won 7-6(4) 6-2 in the semifinal in Cincinnati back in August 2025.
Highlights Jannik Sinner vs Terence Atmane – Cincinnati 16-August-2025
Jannik Sinner
38 - 5win/loss
2
1
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 58-6 | 24-3 | 11-2 | 15-0 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 73-8 | 40-5 | 11-2 | 13-0 | 9-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 64-15 | 28-7 | 8-3 | 20-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-16 | 21-6 | 15-4 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-22 | 22-8 | 10-6 | 17-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 2, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Marin Cilic 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Cilic (6-2 6-2). During the match, Sinner scored 62 points vs Cilic’s 38. Sinner was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sinner recorded 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Jannik Sinner was exceptionally effective on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sinner broke Cilic 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Sinner has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 75% of his matches (384-126). 19-2 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sinner has an aggregate157-48 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title at the Australian Open where he beat Alexander Zverev in the final 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 and at the Wimbledon where he beat Carlos Alcaraz in the final 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.
The Italian has an overall 38-5 win-loss record in 2025, 19-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Terence Atmane
34 - 26win/loss
65
61
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-31 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-32 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 68 (career-high), Terence got to the 2nd round after defeating Fajing Sun 6-4 6-1, Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-6(5) 7-6(7) and Zhizhen Zhang 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Terence had a good straight sets win against Zhang (6-4 6-2). During the match Atmane scored 65 points vs Zhang’s 46. Terence was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Atmane blasted 6 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Terence Atmane was very effective on serve to win 88% (22/25) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Atmane broke Zhang 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Busan Challenger where he overcame Adam Walton in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Guangzhou Challenger where he overcame Tristan Schoolkate in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
Atmane has an aggregate 34-26 win-loss record in 2025, 28-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Atmane has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinner | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 61 |
| Pts | 62-38 | 227-187 |
| Total Points | 100 | 414 |
| Winners | 27 | 84 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Sinner played 1 match while Atmane competed in 3 matches. Atmane started his run from the qualifications while Sinner had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Sinner has played 4 set(s) less than Atmane (2 vs 6). Therefore, Sinner played 45 games less than Atmane. Sinner scored 27 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The French player struck 84 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinner | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 36/47 | 103/193 |
| %1st in | 77% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 84/103 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 51/90 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 57% |
Sinner bagged 3 aces . Atmane managed to score 19 aces (6.3 per match). Sinner won 75% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Atmane won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinner | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 8/20 |
| % Converted | 40% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Sinner broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Jannik very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The French player broke his opponents 8 times with a 40% conversion rate. Terence conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sinner | |||
| R1 Cilic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 62-38 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Atmane | |||||
| Q1 Sun | Q3 Van De Zandschulp | R1 Zhang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 7-65 7-67 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 18 | 61 | |
| pts | 69-51 | 93-90 | 65-46 | 227-187 | |
| Total points | 120 | 183 | 111 | 414 | |
| Winners | 19 | 43 | 22 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 46% | 34% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 6 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 21/56 | 57/89 | 25/48 | 103/193 | |
| % 1st in | 38% | 64% | 52% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 43/57 | 22/25 | 84/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 75% | 88% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 16/32 | 17/23 | 51/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 50% | 74% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 1/7 | 3/8 | 8/20 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 14% | 38% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/3 | 2/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 100% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Beijing
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Romain Arneodo/Sander GilleArneodo/Sander Gille (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Benjamin BonziBonzi (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Bu Yunchaokete/Cameron NorrieYunchaokete/Cameron Norrie – Marcelo Melo/Alexander ZverevMelo/Alexander Zverev (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Marin CilicCilic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Juncheng ShangShang (0-6 7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrey RublevRublev (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alexander BublikBublik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction