Terence Atmane and Botic Van De Zandschulp will play each other in the qualifications of the China Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
Terence Atmane -> 1.85
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
32 - 26win/loss
65
61
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-31 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-32 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 68 (career-high), Terence got to the qualifications after beating Fajing Sun 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Atmane had a good straight sets win against Sun (6-4 6-1). During the match, Atmane scored 69 points vs Sun’s 51. Terence was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Atmane recorded 8 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Terence Atmane was pretty effective on serve to win 90% (19/21) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Atmane broke Sun 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Atmane has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (236-149). 26-15 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Atmane has an overall185-98 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Busan Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Guangzhou Challenger where he beat Tristan Schoolkate in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
The French player has a composed 32-26 win-loss record in 2025, 26-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Atmane has never competed in this tournament before.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
25 - 25win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 84, Botic got to the qualifications after beating Christopher O Connell 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Botic had a good straight sets win against O Connell (6-2 6-2). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 58 points vs O Connell’s 34. Botic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp recorded 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Botic Van De Zandschulp was extremely efficient on serve to win 84% (26/31) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Botic broke O Connell 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Botic’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in Salem.
Botic has an overall 25-25 win-loss record in 2025, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
| Pts | 69-51 | 58-34 |
| Total Points | 120 | 92 |
| Winners | 19 | 26 |
| %Winners | 28% | 45% |
Both Atmane and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Atmane and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Atmane played 1 game more than Van De Zandschulp. Terence scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp made 26 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 7 |
| 1st in | 21/56 | 31/44 |
| %1st in | 38% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 26/31 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 9/13 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 69% |
Atmane made 8 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 7 aces . Atmane won 90% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 80% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Atmane broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Botic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Atmane | |||
| Q1 Sun | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 69-51 | 69-51 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 21/56 | 21/56 | |
| % 1st in | 38% | 38% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 19/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| Q1 O Connell | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 58-34 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/13 | 9/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – David GoffinGoffin (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Marin CilicCilic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction