Mark Lajal and Chris Rodesch will square off in the 2nd round of the Orleans Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 9:30 pm on CENTRAL ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
Mark Lajal -> 1.56
Chris Rodesch -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mark Lajal vs. Chris Rodesch
This will be the 2nd time that Mark Lajal and Chris Rodesch face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Rodesch (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Rodesch won 6-1 6-3 in the qualifications in at the Wimbledon back in June 2025.
Mark Lajal
37 - 19win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 14-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145 (career-high), Lajal reached the 2nd round after defeating Viktor Durasovic 6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Lajal defeated Durasovic (6-3 6-73 7-65). During the match, Lajal scored 120 points vs Durasovic’s 110. Lajal was very aggressive to blast 62 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lajal recorded 13 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Mark Lajal lost the serve once and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Lajal put 59% of his first serves in, winning 82% (62/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (26/52) on the 2nd serve. The Estonian broke Durasovic twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Lajal has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (172-109). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lajal has a compiled46-30 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he defeated Andres Martin in the final 6-7(7) 7-5 7-6(9).
Mark has a composed 37-19 win-loss record in 2025, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Chris Rodesch
32 - 17win/loss
206
150
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-23 | 10-5 | 11-5 | 14-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-11 | 19-2 | 18-4 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-11 | 5-1 | 12-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, the Luxembourger got to the 2nd round after beating Arthur Bouquier 6-1 2-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Luxembourger defeated Bouquier (6-1 2-6 6-4). During the match Rodesch scored 76 points vs Bouquier’s 75. Chris was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Rodesch recorded 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Chris Rodesch was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 55% (21/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Chris broke Bouquier 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Tallahassee Challenger where he defeated Emilio Nava in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
The Luxembourger has an overall 32-17 win-loss record in 2025, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Chris has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lajal | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 25 |
| Pts | 120-110 | 76-75 |
| Total Points | 230 | 151 |
| Winners | 62 | 31 |
| %Winners | 52% | 41% |
Both Lajal and Rodesch played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Mark Lajal dropped 1 set, while Chris Rodesch dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lajal and Rodesch have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Lajal played 10 games more than Rodesch. Lajal scored 62 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Chris fired 31 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lajal | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 8 |
| 1st in | 76/128 | 43/81 |
| %1st in | 59% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 62/76 | 31/43 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 26/52 | 21/38 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 55% |
Lajal blasted 13 aces . Rodesch bagged 8 aces . Lajal won 82% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Rodesch won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lajal | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded | 13 | 6 |
| Saved | 12 | 4 |
| % Saved | 92% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Lajal broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Mark surrendered his serve once and he saved 92% of the break points that he conceded. The Luxembourger broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Rodesch conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lajal | |||
| R1 Durasovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-73 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 120-110 | 120-110 | |
| Total points | 230 | 230 | |
| Winners | 62 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 76/128 | 76/128 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 62/76 | 62/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/52 | 26/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 12/13 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 92% | 92% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Rodesch | |||
| R1 Bouquier | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 76-75 | 76-75 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 43/81 | 43/81 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 21/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Orleans Challenger
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Hugo GrenierGrenier (3-6 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mae MaligeMalige – Leo RaquilletRaquillet (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-3 6-73 7-65) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Arthur BouquierBouquier (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Hugo GrenierGrenier (3-6 6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Mae MaligeMalige – Leo RaquilletRaquillet (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – (0-0) – H2H and prediction