Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Varillas who should win in 2 sets.
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 1.188
Juan Manuel La Serna -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Juan Manuel La Serna
There is no head to head record between Juan Pablo Varillas and Juan Manuel La Serna since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Juan Pablo Varillas
21 - 12win/loss
327
60
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-31 | 0-5 | 27-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 4-7 | 23-17 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 2-3 | 51-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-23 | 0-2 | 51-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 324, Pablo Patino-Samudio reached the qualifications after beating Ignacio Monzon 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Pablo Patino-Samudio had a good straight sets win against Monzon (6-4 6-4). During the match, Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 69 points vs Monzon’s 53. Pablo Patino-Samudio was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pablo Patino-Samudio blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Juan Pablo Varillas was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Juan broke Monzon 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (375-246). 20-11 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pablo Patino-Samudio has a composed 348-202 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Buenos Aires Challenger where he beat Adolfo Daniel Vallejo in the final 6-4 6-4.
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a composed 20-12 win-loss record in 2025, 20-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Buenos Aires Challenger
Juan Manuel La Serna
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-22 | 0-0 | 33-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-21 | 0-0 | 34-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-20 | 0-0 | 35-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-10 | 1-2 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 531, Manuel La Serna got to the qualifications after defeating Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Manuel La Serna had a good straight sets win against Aguilar Cardozo (6-4 6-4). During the match Manuel La Serna scored 77 points vs Aguilar Cardozo’s 67. Manuel La Serna was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Manuel La Serna was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Juan Manuel La Serna lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Manuel La Serna put 65% of his first serves in, winning 63% (26/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the 2nd serve. Manuel La Serna broke Aguilar Cardozo 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
Juan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Villa Maria and M25 Chacabuco.
Manuel La Serna has an aggregate 26-17 win-loss record in 2025, 23-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Buenos Aires Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Manuel La Serna |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 |
| Pts | 69-53 | 77-67 |
| Total Points | 122 | 144 |
| Winners | 28 | 26 |
| %Winners | 41% | 34% |
Both Pablo Patino-Samudio and Manuel La Serna played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pablo Patino-Samudio and Manuel La Serna have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (20). The Peruvian scored 28 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Juan recorded 26 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Manuel La Serna |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
| 1st in | 34/52 | 41/63 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 26/41 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 12/22 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 55% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio bagged 7 aces . Manuel La Serna didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pablo Patino-Samudio won 82% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Manuel La Serna won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Manuel La Serna |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/16 |
| % Converted | 43% | 31% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Pablo Patino-Samudio broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Peruvian dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pablo Patino-Samudio | |||
| Q1 Monzon | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-53 | 69-53 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/52 | 34/52 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Manuel La Serna | |||
| Q1 Aguilar Cardozo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/63 | 41/63 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 26/41 | 26/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Facundo JuarezJuarez (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (4-3) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Emilio NavaNava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Matias SotoSoto (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez (1-0) – H2H and prediction