Marc-Andrea Huesler and Milos Karol will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Orleans Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on ST CYR EN VAL NO.2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc-Andrea Huesler who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc-Andrea Huesler is the pick to win this match.
Marc-Andrea Huesler -> 1.4
Milos Karol -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc-Andrea Huesler vs. Milos Karol
There is no head to head record between Marc-Andrea Huesler and Milos Karol since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Marc-Andrea Huesler
20 - 20win/loss
245
47
LWLWLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-27 | 14-11 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-28 | 11-6 | 16-10 | 10-9 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-31 | 7-9 | 2-10 | 5-8 | 4-3 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 45-28 | 9-8 | 18-6 | 11-10 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-33 | 3-6 | 14-15 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 223, Huesler reached the qualifications after beating Nikolay Vylegzhanin 6-3 7-6(7).
In the qualifications, Marc-Andrea had a good straight sets win against Vylegzhanin (6-3 7-67). During the match, Huesler scored 73 points vs Vylegzhanin’s 62. Marc-Andrea was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Huesler struck 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marc-Andrea Huesler was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (34/40) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Swiss broke Vylegzhanin twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Huesler has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (309-256). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Huesler has an aggregate 59-60 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Cuernavaca Challenger where he defeated Dmitry Popko in the final 6-4 3-6 6-4.
The Swiss has a compiled 20-20 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Milos Karol
27 - 22win/loss
436
356
LWWWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-29 | 4-4 | 20-14 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 53-31 | 8-5 | 21-17 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 28-27 | 3-2 | 11-13 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 6-24 | 3-5 | 1-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 356 (career-high), Milos reached the qualifications after beating Florian Broska 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Karol had a good straight sets win against Broska (6-3 6-4). During the match Karol scored 61 points vs Broska’s 44. The Slovakian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Karol recorded 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Milos Karol was quite efficient on serve to win 93% (25/27) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Slovakian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Broska twice.
Karol’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Warmbad Villach.
Karol has an aggregate 27-22 win-loss record in 2025, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
The Slovakian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Huesler | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 |
| Pts | 73-62 | 61-44 |
| Total Points | 135 | 105 |
| Winners | 34 | 25 |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% |
Both Huesler and Karol played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Huesler and Karol have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Huesler played 3 games more than Karol. The Swiss scored 34 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Karol fired 25 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Huesler | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 8 |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 27/53 |
| %1st in | 69% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 25/27 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 93% |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 16/26 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 62% |
Huesler recorded 10 aces . Karol struck 8 aces . Huesler won 85% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Karol won 93% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Huesler | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 40% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Huesler broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Swiss was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Milos broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Milos was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Huesler | |||
| Q1 Vylegzhanin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 34/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Karol | |||
| Q1 Broska |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/53 | 27/53 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 25/27 | 25/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLLWL
LWWWLLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Florent BaxBax (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Hugo GrenierGrenier (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cyril VandermeerschVandermeersch – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
