Tyler Zink and Samir Banerjee will clash against each other in the quarter of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Samir Banerjee who should win in 3 sets.
Samir Banerjee -> 1.55
Tyler Zink -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tyler Zink vs. Samir Banerjee
There is no head to head record between Tyler Zink and Samir Banerjee since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tyler Zink
31 - 23win/loss
293
278
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-31 | 13-14 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 360, the American got to the quarter after defeating Alexander Bernard 6-3 6-3 and Abedallah Shelbayh 6-4 7-6(6).
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Shelbayh (6-4 7-66). During the match, Zink scored 91 points vs Shelbayh’s 76. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zink fired 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tyler Zink lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 57% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the 2nd serve. Tyler broke Shelbayh 4 times after converting 22% of his break points (4/18).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zink hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Zink has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (95-75). 7-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zink has an aggregate18-10 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Tyler’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Orange Park.
Tyler has a compiled 31-23 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Samir Banerjee
20 - 4win/loss
354
347
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-10 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 18-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-12 | 12-6 | 5-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-11 | 4-9 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-6 | 9-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 441, Samir got to the quarter after defeating Elmar Ejupovic 7-5 7-6(3)
, Nikita Filin 6-3 6-3, Christian Langmo 7-6(2) 6-2 and Darwin Blanch 6-0 3-6 6-3.In the 2nd round, Banerjee defeated Blanch (6-0 3-6 6-3). During the match Banerjee scored 97 points vs Blanch’s 83. Banerjee was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Banerjee struck 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Samir Banerjee lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Banerjee put 60% of his first serves in, winning 68% (36/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (16/36) on the 2nd serve. Banerjee broke Blanch 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Dallas and M25 Trelew.
Banerjee has a composed 20-4 win-loss record in 2025, 14-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Banerjee has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zink | Banerjee |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 88 |
| Pts | 158-126 | 327-264 |
| Total Points | 284 | 591 |
| Winners | 45 | 120 |
| %Winners | 28% | 37% |
Zink played 2 matches while Banerjee competed in 4 matches. Banerjee started his run from the qualifications while Zink had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Samir Banerjee lost 1 set while Tyler Zink hasn’t dropped a set so far. Zink has played 5 set(s) less than Banerjee (4 vs 9). Therefore, Zink played 47 games less than Banerjee. Zink scored 45 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Banerjee made 120 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zink | Banerjee |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 64/116 | 160/276 |
| %1st in | 55% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 45/64 | 120/160 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 33/52 | 62/116 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 53% |
Zink recorded 9 aces (4.5 per match). Banerjee made 18 aces (4.5 per match). Zink won 70% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Banerjee won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zink | Banerjee |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 16 |
| Converted | 8/24 | 16/42 |
| % Converted | 33% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 15 |
| Saved | 3 | 8 |
| % Saved | 43% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
Tyler broke his opponents 8 times with a 33% conversion rate. Zink dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 16 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zink | ||||
| R1 Bernard | R2 Shelbayh | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 41 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 91-76 | 158-126 | |
| Total points | 117 | 167 | 284 | |
| Winners | 19 | 26 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 29% | 28% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/48 | 39/68 | 64/116 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 57% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 26/39 | 45/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 67% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 18/29 | 33/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 62% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/18 | 8/24 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 22% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 25% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Banerjee | ||||||
| Q1 Ejupovic | Q3 Filin | R1 Langmo | R2 Blanch | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-63 | 6-3 6-3 | 7-62 6-2 | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 88 | |
| pts | 83-69 | 60-44 | 87-68 | 97-83 | 327-264 | |
| Total points | 152 | 104 | 155 | 180 | 591 | |
| Winners | 31 | 23 | 30 | 36 | 120 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% | 34% | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 38/73 | 30/46 | 39/68 | 53/89 | 160/276 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 65% | 57% | 60% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 23/30 | 30/39 | 36/53 | 120/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 77% | 77% | 68% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 11/16 | 16/29 | 16/36 | 62/116 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 69% | 55% | 44% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 16 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/5 | 3/11 | 6/17 | 16/42 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 80% | 27% | 35% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/2 | 0/1 | 5/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 0% | 63% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction