Federico Agustin Gomez and Hernan Casanova will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Villa Maria Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 6:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.53
Hernan Casanova -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Hernan Casanova
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and Hernan Casanova since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
14 - 21win/loss
269
133
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-29 | 5-7 | 15-19 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, the Argentine got to the 2nd round after defeating Fernando Cavallo 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Cavallo (6-2 7-5). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 65 points vs Cavallo’s 45. Agustin Gomez was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agustin Gomez struck 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Federico Agustin Gomez was extremely efficient on serve to win 91% (30/33) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Federico broke Cavallo 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Agustin Gomez has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (182-110). 8-11 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Agustin Gomez has a composed116-65 record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Sarasota Challenger.
Agustin Gomez has an aggregate 14-21 win-loss record in 2025, 8-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Hernan Casanova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-22 | 0-0 | 43-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 32-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 0-2 | 29-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-32 | 3-3 | 42-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 435, Casanova reached the 2nd round after beating Juan Sebastian Gomez 6-3 6-3, Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen 6-2 6-3 and Nicolas Kicker 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Kicker (6-3 6-2). During the match Casanova scored 59 points vs Kicker’s 41. Casanova was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Casanova struck 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Hernan Casanova was very effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hernan was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kicker 3 times.
Hernan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Santiago and M25 Gentofte.
Casanova has a composed 34-18 win-loss record in 2025, 31-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agustin Gomez | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 52 |
| Pts | 65-45 | 181-126 |
| Total Points | 110 | 307 |
| Winners | 30 | 86 |
| %Winners | 46% | 48% |
Agustin Gomez played 1 match while Casanova competed in 3 matches. Casanova started his run from the qualifications while Agustin Gomez had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Agustin Gomez has played 4 set(s) less than Casanova (2 vs 6). Therefore, Agustin Gomez played 32 games less than Casanova. The Argentine scored 30 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Hernan bagged 86 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agustin Gomez | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 1 |
| 1st in | 33/50 | 115/152 |
| %1st in | 66% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 86/115 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 23/37 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 62% |
Agustin Gomez struck 7 aces . Casanova scored 3 aces (1 per match). Agustin Gomez won 91% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Casanova won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 11/17 |
| % Converted | 50% | 65% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Federico broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Federico had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Hernan broke his opponents 11 times with a 65% conversion rate. Casanova conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agustin Gomez | |||
| R1 Cavallo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 65-45 | 65-45 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 30/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Casanova | |||||
| Q1 Sebastian Gomez | Q3 Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen | R1 Kicker | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 17 | 52 | |
| pts | 63-43 | 59-42 | 59-41 | 181-126 | |
| Total points | 106 | 101 | 100 | 307 | |
| Winners | 26 | 31 | 29 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 53% | 49% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/51 | 40/46 | 37/55 | 115/152 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 87% | 67% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 31/40 | 29/37 | 86/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 78% | 78% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/13 | 3/6 | 11/18 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 50% | 61% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/6 | 3/3 | 11/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 100% | 65% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 100% | 250% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Villa Maria Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo – Maximus JonesJones (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Matias SotoSoto (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Murkel DellienDellien – Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Facundo BagnisBagnis (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-1) – H2H and prediction