Tyler Zink and Abedallah Shelbayh will face off in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Abedallah Shelbayh who should win in 3 sets.
Abedallah Shelbayh -> 1.85
Tyler Zink -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tyler Zink vs. Abedallah Shelbayh
There is no head to head record between Tyler Zink and Abedallah Shelbayh since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tyler Zink
30 - 23win/loss
293
278
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-31 | 13-14 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 360, Zink got to the 2nd round after beating Alexander Bernard 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Zink had a good straight sets win against Bernard (6-3 6-3). During the match, Zink scored 67 points vs Bernard’s 50. Zink was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zink fired 4 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tyler Zink was very effective on serve to win 76% (19/25) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Bernard 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Zink has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (94-75). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Zink has a composed17-10 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Orange Park.
Tyler has an aggregate 30-23 win-loss record in 2025, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Abedallah Shelbayh
17 - 25win/loss
278
181
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-29 | 24-13 | 0-11 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-35 | 18-13 | 12-13 | 8-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-32 | 27-15 | 7-7 | 5-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-7 | 17-5 | 3-1 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-8 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 428, Shelbayh reached the 2nd round after defeating Murphy Cassone 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Shelbayh had a good straight sets win against Cassone (6-4 6-4). During the match Shelbayh scored 69 points vs Cassone’s 58. Shelbayh was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Shelbayh bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Abedallah Shelbayh was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 67% (18/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Abedallah broke Cassone twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
The’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Astana Challenger.
Abedallah has a composed 17-25 win-loss record in 2025, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zink | Shelbayh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 |
| Pts | 67-50 | 69-58 |
| Total Points | 117 | 127 |
| Winners | 19 | 30 |
| %Winners | 28% | 43% |
Both Zink and Shelbayh played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zink and Shelbayh have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zink played 2 games less than Shelbayh. The American scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Shelbayh blasted 30 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zink | Shelbayh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 25/48 | 39/66 |
| %1st in | 52% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 30/39 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 18/27 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 67% |
Zink blasted 4 aces . Shelbayh scored 2 aces . Zink won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Shelbayh won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zink | Shelbayh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 67% | 33% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Tyler broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Zink surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Shelbayh broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Abedallah was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Zink | |||
| R1 Bernard | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 25/48 | 25/48 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Shelbayh | |||
| R1 Cassone | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-58 | 69-58 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 39/66 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Martin DammDamm – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael ZhengZheng – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel MasurMasur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – (0-0) – H2H and prediction