Andres Martin and Daniel Masur will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andres Martin who should win in 3 sets.
Andres Martin -> 1.44
Daniel Masur -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Andres Martin vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Andres Martin and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Andres Martin
41 - 20win/loss
264
264
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-28 | 32-18 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286, Martin reached the 2nd round after beating Federico Bondioli 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Martin had a good straight sets win against Bondioli (6-3 6-2). During the match, Martin scored 74 points vs Bondioli’s 54. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martin couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Andres Martin was very efficient on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Martin broke Bondioli 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Martin has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 61% of his matches (96-61). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Martin has a composed13-9 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Martin’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Kingston,M25 Calabasas and the Bloomfield Hills Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 41-20 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Daniel Masur
17 - 21win/loss
492
176
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-27 | 9-6 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
Ranked no. 536, Masur reached the 2nd round after defeating Karl Poling 6-1 6-3, Tristan Mccormick 6-4 6-2 and Preston Stearns 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, The German defeated Stearns (6-4 6-74 7-65). During the match Masur scored 120 points vs Stearns’s 114. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur struck 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Masur was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (56/71) of his 1st serve and 53% (21/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The German broke Stearns 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
The German’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Cervia.
Masur has a composed 17-21 win-loss record in 2025, 4-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 70 |
| Pts | 74-54 | 242-196 |
| Total Points | 128 | 438 |
| Winners | 27 | 101 |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% |
Martin played 1 match while Masur competed in 3 matches. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Martin had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Masur surrendered 1 set while Andres Martin hasn’t dropped a set so far. Martin has played 5 set(s) less than Masur (2 vs 7). Therefore, Martin played 53 games less than Masur. Andres scored 27 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Masur blasted 101 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 9 |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 119/195 |
| %1st in | 63% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 101/119 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 44/76 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 58% |
Martin didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Masur recorded 27 aces (9 per match). Martin won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 10/32 |
| % Converted | 29% | 31% |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Martin broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Martin dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 10 times with a 31% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin | |||
| R1 Bondioli | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 74-54 | 74-54 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Masur | |||||
| Q1 Poling | Q3 Mccormick | R1 Stearns | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-74 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 | 36 | 70 | |
| pts | 64-41 | 58-41 | 120-114 | 242-196 | |
| Total points | 105 | 99 | 234 | 438 | |
| Winners | 22 | 23 | 56 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% | 47% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 11 | 11 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 25/44 | 71/111 | 119/195 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 57% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 22/23 | 23/25 | 56/71 | 101/119 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 92% | 79% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 13/19 | 21/40 | 44/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 68% | 53% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/14 | 10/32 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 33% | 21% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Michael ZhengZheng – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Martin DammDamm – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel MasurMasur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – (0-0) – H2H and prediction