Emilio Nava and Juan Pablo Varillas will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Villa Maria Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
Emilio Nava -> 1.44
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Juan Pablo Varillas
This will be the 4th time that Emilio Nava and Juan Pablo Varillas face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Pablo Patino-Samudio (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Nava won 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Asuncion Challenger back in March 2025.
Emilio Nava
49 - 23win/loss
88
88
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-28 | 8-7 | 45-19 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 100 (career-high), Nava reached the 2nd round after beating Daniel Dutra Da Silva 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Dutra Da Silva, Emilio recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Nava scored 97 points vs Dutra Da Silva’s 86. Nava was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava recorded 14 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (46/62) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Nava broke Dutra Da Silva 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Nava has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (235-157). 37-14 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has a composed106-51 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Asuncion Challenger where he overcame Thiago Moura Monteiro in the final 7-5 6-3 and the Concepcion Challenger where he overcame Nicolas Kicker in the final 6-1 7-6(3) and the Sarasota Challenger where he beat Liam Draxl in the final 6-2 7-6(2).
Emilio has an overall 48-23 win-loss record in 2025, 37-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Pablo Varillas
19 - 12win/loss
327
60
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-31 | 0-5 | 27-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 4-7 | 23-17 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 2-3 | 51-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-23 | 0-2 | 51-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 324, the Peruvian got to the 2nd round after defeating Santiago De La Fuente 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Juan had a good straight sets win against De La Fuente (7-65 6-3). During the match Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 86 points vs De La Fuente’s 72. Juan was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Pablo Patino-Samudio wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Juan Pablo Varillas lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Patino-Samudio put 49% of his first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (15/35) on the 2nd serve. Pablo Patino-Samudio broke De La Fuente 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Buenos Aires Challenger where he beat Adolfo Daniel Vallejo in the final 6-4 6-4.
Juan has an aggregate 19-11 win-loss record in 2025, 19-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 22 |
| Pts | 97-86 | 86-72 |
| Total Points | 183 | 158 |
| Winners | 46 | 23 |
| %Winners | 47% | 27% |
Both Nava and Pablo Patino-Samudio played 1 match. At the moment, Emilio Nava conceded 1 set while Juan Pablo Varillas hasn’t lost a set so far. Nava has played 1 set more than Pablo Patino-Samudio (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nava played 8 games more than Pablo Patino-Samudio. The American scored 46 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Pablo Patino-Samudio fired 23 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 0 |
| 1st in | 62/92 | 34/69 |
| %1st in | 67% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 46/62 | 23/34 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 15/35 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 43% |
Nava fired 14 aces . Pablo Patino-Samudio didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nava won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Pablo Patino-Samudio won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 60% | 46% |
| Conceded | 11 | 7 |
| Saved | 9 | 3 |
| % Saved | 82% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Emilio dropped his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. Pablo Patino-Samudio broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Peruvian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Dutra Da Silva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 97-86 | 97-86 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 62/92 | 62/92 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 46/62 | 46/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Pablo Patino-Samudio | |||
| R1 De La Fuente | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 86-72 | 86-72 | |
| Total points | 158 | 158 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/69 | 34/69 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/35 | 15/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Villa Maria Challenger
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Fernando CavalloCavallo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex BarrenaBarrena – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiEmanuel Ambrogi (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Santiago De La FuenteDe La Fuente (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-75 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Carlos Maria ZarateMaria Zarate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Facundo JuarezJuarez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-74 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel La SernaManuel La Serna – Lautaro Agustin FalabellaAgustin Falabella (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Lautaro MidonMidon – Hugo DellienDellien (6-0 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximus JonesJones – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez (7-614 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Murkel DellienDellien – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-7(4) 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiEmanuel Ambrogi (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Fernando CavalloCavallo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex BarrenaBarrena – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel La SernaManuel La Serna – Lautaro Agustin FalabellaAgustin Falabella (7-6(2) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Facundo JuarezJuarez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lautaro MidonMidon – Hugo DellienDellien (6-0 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Facundo BagnisBagnis (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction