Preston Stearns and Daniel Masur will square off in the 1st round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 2 sets.
Daniel Masur -> 1.22
Preston Stearns -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Preston Stearns vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Preston Stearns and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Preston Stearns
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-11 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Stearns reached the 1st round after defeating Carlo Alberto Caniato 6-4 6-7(6) 7-6(5) and Kaylan Bigun 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Bigun (6-3 6-75 6-4). During the match, Stearns scored 120 points vs Bigun’s 106. Stearns was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stearns made 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Preston Stearns was very efficient on serve to win 76% (41/54) of his 1st serve and 60% (28/47) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Preston broke Bigun 4 times after converting 24% of his break points (4/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stearns started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in this event to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Stearns has a losing match record in the last 3 years having won 46% of his matches (16-19). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Stearns has an aggregate6-5 win-loss record in the last 3 years on indoor hard courts.
Preston has an overall 6-5 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Daniel Masur
16 - 21win/loss
492
176
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-27 | 9-6 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
Ranked no. 536, Masur got to the 1st round after defeating Karl Poling 6-1 6-3 and Tristan Mccormick 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Mccormick (6-4 6-2). During the match Masur scored 58 points vs Mccormick’s 41. Masur was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Masur blasted 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniel Masur was extremely efficient on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Mccormick 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniel started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cervia.
Masur has an overall 16-21 win-loss record in 2025, 3-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Masur has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stearns | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 34 |
| Pts | 235-218 | 122-82 |
| Total Points | 453 | 204 |
| Winners | 98 | 45 |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% |
Both Stearns and Masur played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Preston Stearns dropped 2 sets while Daniel Masur hasn’t conceded a set so far. Stearns has played 2 sets more than Masur (6 vs 4). Therefore, Stearns played 34 games more than Masur. Preston scored 98 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Masur blasted 45 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stearns | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 27 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 13.5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 128/219 | 48/84 |
| %1st in | 58% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 98/128 | 45/48 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 94% |
| 2nd pts | 48/91 | 23/36 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 64% |
Stearns fired 27 aces (13.5 per match). Masur bagged 16 aces (8 per match). Stearns won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 94% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stearns | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 7 |
| Converted | 7/23 | 7/18 |
| % Converted | 30% | 39% |
| Conceded | 12 | 0 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Stearns broke his opponents 7 times with a 30% conversion rate. Preston surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. The German was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Stearns | ||||
| Q1 Alberto | Q3 Bigun | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-76 7-65 | 6-3 6-75 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 32 | 68 | |
| pts | 115-112 | 120-106 | 235-218 | |
| Total points | 227 | 226 | 453 | |
| Winners | 57 | 41 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 34% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 11 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 74/118 | 54/101 | 128/219 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 53% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 57/74 | 41/54 | 98/128 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 76% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/44 | 28/47 | 48/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 60% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/17 | 7/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 24% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 3/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 60% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Masur | ||||
| Q1 Poling | Q3 Mccormick | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 | 34 | |
| pts | 64-41 | 58-41 | 122-82 | |
| Total points | 105 | 99 | 204 | |
| Winners | 22 | 23 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 11 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 25/44 | 48/84 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 22/23 | 23/25 | 45/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 92% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 13/19 | 23/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 68% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/9 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 33% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Samir BanerjeeBanerjee – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-6(2) 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Jack AnthropAnthrop (3-6 6-1 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samir BanerjeeBanerjee – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-6(2) 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Johannus MondayMonday (6-3 3-6 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Sebastian DominkoDominko (6-3 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tyler ZinkZink – Alexander BernardBernard (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – Theo PapamalamisPapamalamis (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Martin DammDamm – Aidan KimKim (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael ZhengZheng – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Justin BoulaisBoulais (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – (0-0) – H2H and prediction