Daniel Uta and Amaury Raynel will face off in the 1st round of the Targu Mures 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Amaury Raynel who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Amaury Raynel is the pick to win this match.
Amaury Raynel -> 1.118
Daniel Uta -> 5.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Uta vs. Amaury Raynel
There is no head to head record between Daniel Uta and Amaury Raynel since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniel Uta
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-23 | 0-1 | 25-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-20 | 0-0 | 14-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Romanian reached the 1st round after defeating Brandon Perez 6-3 6-3 and Tommaso Compagnucci 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Compagnucci, Daniel recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3).During the match, Uta scored less points (7) than Compagnucci. In fact, the world no. won 97 points vs Compagnucci’s. That means that Uta was more focused during the important points. Daniel was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Uta scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 7 double faults. Daniel Uta lost the serve 6 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Uta put 66% of his first serves in, winning 58% (39/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (12/34) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Compagnucci 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniel started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in this event to win 48% of the points he played.
Uta has a negative win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 41% of his matches (25-36). 11-14 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Uta has a compiled25-34 win-loss record in the last 2 years on clay.
Uta has a compiled 11-16 win-loss record in 2025, 11-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Amaury Raynel
26 - 23win/loss
738
622
LWLWWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-29 | 0-1 | 23-20 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-20 | 4-4 | 10-9 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 19-10 | 14-14 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-30 | 20-12 | 19-14 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 16-9 | 17-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
Ranked no. 747, the French player got to the 1st round after defeating Filippo Romano 3-6 6-4 6-2 and Gianluca Cadenasso 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Cadenasso (7-65 6-4). During the match Raynel scored 83 points vs Cadenasso’s 74. Raynel was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Raynel wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Amaury Raynel lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Raynel put 89% of his first serves in, winning 62% (42/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (4/8) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Cadenasso 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Raynel started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Amaury’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Creteil and M15 Saarlouis.
The French player has a compiled 26-23 win-loss record in 2025, 17-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Uta | Raynel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 50 |
| Pts | 97-104 | 163-143 |
| Total Points | 201 | 306 |
| Winners | 39 | 84 |
| %Winners | 40% | 52% |
Both Uta and Raynel played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Daniel Uta conceded 1 set, while Amaury Raynel conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Uta and Raynel have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Uta played 2 games less than Raynel. Uta scored 39 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Raynel made 84 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Uta | Raynel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 67/101 | 129/147 |
| %1st in | 66% | 88% |
| 1st pts | 39/67 | 84/129 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 12/34 | 8/18 |
| %2nd pts | 35% | 44% |
Uta blasted 1 ace (0.5 per match). Raynel didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Uta won 58% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 35% of the points. On the other side, Raynel won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Uta | Raynel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 9 |
| Converted | 7/16 | 9/16 |
| % Converted | 44% | 56% |
| Conceded | 16 | 10 |
| Saved | 10 | 4 |
| % Saved | 63% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Uta broke his opponents 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Amaury broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Raynel conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Uta | ||||||
| Q1 Perez |
Q1 Perez |
Q3 Compagnucci |
Q3 Compagnucci |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 30 | 30 | 96 | |
| pts | – | – | 97-104 | 97-104 | 194-208 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | 201 | 201 | 402 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | 78 | |||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | 14 | |||
| 1st in | / | / | 67/101 | 67/101 | 134/202 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | / | / | 39/67 | 39/67 | 78/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | 58% | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | / | / | 12/34 | 12/34 | 24/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | 35% | 35% | 35% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 7 | 14 | |||
| Converted | / | / | 7/16 | 7/16 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | 44% | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | 32 | |||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/ | 10/16 | 10/16 | 20 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 63% | 63% | 32% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | 12 | |||
| Raynel | ||||||
| Q1 Romano |
Q3 Cadenasso |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | 7-65 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Tot Games | 27 | 23 | 50 | |||
| pts | 80-69 | 83-74 | 163-143 | |||
| Total points | 149 | 157 | 306 | |||
| Winners | 42 | 42 | 84 | |||
| %Winners | 53% | 51% | 52% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
| 1st in | 61/71 | 68/76 | 129/147 | |||
| % 1st in | 86% | 89% | 88% | |||
| 1st pts | 42/61 | 42/68 | 84/129 | |||
| % 1st pts | 69% | 62% | 65% | |||
| 2nd pts | 4/10 | 4/8 | 8/18 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 50% | 44% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |||
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/8 | 9/16 | |||
| Converted % | 63% | 50% | 56% | |||
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 10 | |||
| Saved | 1/4 | 3/6 | 4 | |||
| Saved % | 25% | 50% | 19% | |||
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 6 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWW
LWLWWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Targu Mures 2 Challenger
- Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-62 2-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian GimaGima – Mihai Alexandru ComanAlexandru Coman (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Miguel DamasDamas – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Oleksandr OvcharenkoOvcharenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan Alexandru TomescuAlexandru Tomescu – Andrea PicchionePicchione (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miguel DamasDamas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
