Jack Loge and John Sperle will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Targu Mures 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Loge who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Loge is the pick to win this match.
Jack Loge -> 1.86
John Sperle -> 1.86
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Loge vs. John Sperle
There is no head to head record between Jack Loge and John Sperle since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jack Loge
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 39-24 | 19-9 | 19-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 50-28 | 18-12 | 32-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-26 | 17-11 | 11-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-28 | 24-14 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-7 | 7-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 538, the Belgian reached the qualifications after defeating Darius Florin Pop 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Florin Pop (7-5 6-0). During the match, Loge scored 68 points vs Florin Pop’s 42. Loge was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Loge scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Jack Loge lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Loge put 78% of his first serves in, winning 63% (29/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (5/13) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Florin Pop 7 times after converting 88% of his break points (7/8).
Loge has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (113-82). 30-15 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Loge has a compiled51-41 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The Belgian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Prijedor,M25 Metzingen and M15 Huy.
The Belgian has an overall 41-21 win-loss record in 2025, 30-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Targu Mures 2 Challenger
John Sperle
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 35-22 | 0-0 | 34-21 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 31-28 | 0-0 | 31-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 6-8 | 33-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-26 | 10-7 | 32-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-21 | 1-2 | 24-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 733, John got to the qualifications after defeating Emilien Demanet 5-7 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications against Demanet, John recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-1 7-5). During the match Sperle scored 101 points vs Demanet’s 83. The German was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Sperle blasted 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. John Sperle lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sperle put 60% of his first serves in, winning 62% (37/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (24/40) on the 2nd serve. Sperle broke Demanet 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The German has a composed 25-21 win-loss record in 2025, 25-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Loge | Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
| Pts | 68-42 | 101-83 |
| Total Points | 110 | 184 |
| Winners | 29 | 37 |
| %Winners | 43% | 37% |
Both Loge and Sperle played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, John Sperle conceded 1 set while Jack Loge hasn’t lost a set so far. Loge has played 1 set(s) less than Sperle (2 vs 3). Therefore, Loge played 13 games less than Sperle. Jack scored 29 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, John blasted 37 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Loge | Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 46/59 | 60/100 |
| %1st in | 78% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 37/60 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 5/13 | 24/40 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 60% |
Loge made 1 ace . Sperle also scored 3 aces . Loge won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Sperle won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Loge | Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/8 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 88% | 67% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 25% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Jack broke his opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. Jack dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Sperle broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. John conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Loge | |||
| Q1 Florin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-42 | 68-42 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 46/59 | 46/59 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Sperle | |||
| Q1 Demanet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 101-83 | 101-83 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 60/100 | 60/100 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Oleksandr OvcharenkoOvcharenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Miguel DamasDamas (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu Mihai PapoeMihai Papoe – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
