Daniel Milavsky and Sebastian Dominko will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Milavsky who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Daniel Milavsky is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Milavsky -> 1.58
Sebastian Dominko -> 2.26

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Daniel Milavsky vs. Sebastian Dominko

There is no head to head record between Daniel Milavsky and Sebastian Dominko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.

Daniel Milavsky

Ranked no. 449 (career-high), Daniel got to the qualifications after beating Blaise Bicknell 6-7(11) 6-1 6-3.

In the qualifications against Bicknell, Milavsky recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-7¹¹ 6-1 6-3). During the match, Milavsky scored 98 points vs Bicknell’s 74. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.

Talking about the service games, Milavsky made 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Daniel Milavsky was very effective on serve to win 82% (41/50) of his 1st serve and 71% (22/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Bicknell 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).

Milavsky has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 71% of his matches (55-23). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Milavsky has a composed13-2 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.

Daniel’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kingston,M15 Sherbrooke and Nova.

The American has a composed 34-14 win-loss record in 2025, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Columbus Challenger

Milavsky has never competed in this tournament before.

Sebastian Dominko

Currently unranked, Dominko reached the qualifications after beating Edward Winter 3-6 6-4 6-4

.

In the qualifications against Winter, Dominko recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Dominko scored 89 points vs Winter’s 86. The Slovenian was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.

About the serving games, Dominko bagged 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Sebastian Dominko was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (31/40) of his 1st serve and 65% (31/48) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Slovenian broke Winter twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).

Dominko’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Doboj.

Sebastian has an aggregate 10-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)

.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Milavsky	Dominko
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	29	29
Pts	98-74	89-86
Total Points	172	175
Winners	41	31
%Winners	42%	35%

Both Milavsky and Dominko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Daniel Milavsky lost 1 set, while Sebastian Dominko lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Milavsky and Dominko have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (29). Milavsky scored 41 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Sebastian bagged 31 winners (35%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Milavsky	Dominko
Aces	10	11
Avg per match	10	11
1st in	50/81	40/88
%1st in	62%	45%
1st pts	41/50	31/40
%1st pts	82%	78%
2nd pts	22/31	31/48
%2nd pts	71%	65%

Milavsky recorded 10 aces . Dominko bagged 11 aces . Milavsky won 82% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Dominko won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Milavsky	Dominko
Won	5	2
Converted	5/8	2/5
% Converted	63%	40%
Conceded	2	9
Saved	1	8
% Saved	50%	89%
Times Broken	1	1

Milavsky broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Milavsky conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Dominko broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Dominko conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.

Milavsky
	Q1 Bicknell	Total
Score	6-711 6-1 6-3
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	29	29
pts	98-74	98-74
Total points	172	172
Winners	41	41
%Winners	42%	42%
SERVE
Aces	10	10
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	50/81	50/81
% 1st in	62%	62%
1st pts	41/50	41/50
% 1st pts	82%	82%
2nd pts	22/31	22/31
% 2nd pts	71%	71%
Breaks
Won	5	5
Converted	5/8	5/8
Converted %	63%	63%
Conceded	2	2
Saved	1/2	1
Saved %	50%	50%
Times Broken	1	1

Dominko
	Q1 Winter	Total
Score	3-6 6-4 6-4
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	29	29
pts	89-86	89-86
Total points	175	175
Winners	31	31
%Winners	35%	35%
SERVE
Aces	11	11
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	40/88	40/88
% 1st in	45%	45%
1st pts	31/40	31/40
% 1st pts	78%	78%
2nd pts	31/48	31/48
% 2nd pts	65%	65%
Breaks
Won	2	2
Converted	2/5	2/5
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	9	9
Saved	8/9	8
Saved %	89%	89%
Times Broken	1	1

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alfredo PerezPerez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
• Alex RybakovRybakov – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Tristan MccormickMccormick – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Tyler ZinkZink – (2-1) – H2H and prediction