Tristan Mccormick and Daniel Masur will play each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 2 sets.
Daniel Masur -> 1.35
Tristan Mccormick -> 2.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Mccormick vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Tristan Mccormick and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Mccormick
34 - 29win/loss
516
484
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-37 | 13-16 | 18-17 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 17-17 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 4-7 | 14-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 13-5 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-6 | 14-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 485, Tristan reached the qualifications after defeating Luca Castagnola 4-6 6-3 7-6(5).
In the qualifications against Castagnola, Tristan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-65). During the match, Mccormick scored 105 points vs Castagnola’s 97. Tristan was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mccormick blasted 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tristan Mccormick lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mccormick put 61% of his first serves in, winning 75% (45/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve. Mccormick broke Castagnola 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Mccormick has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (136-100). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mccormick has a composed17-12 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Tristan’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Orange Park,M25 Gandia and Nova.
The American has a compiled 34-28 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
16 - 21win/loss
521
176
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-27 | 9-6 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
Ranked no. 529, the German got to the qualifications after defeating Karl Poling 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Poling (6-1 6-3). During the match Masur scored 64 points vs Poling’s 41. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur struck 5 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Daniel Masur was very efficient on serve to win 96% (22/23) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Poling 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Daniel’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Cervia.
The German has an overall 15-21 win-loss record in 2025, 2-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mccormick | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 16 |
| Pts | 105-97 | 64-41 |
| Total Points | 202 | 105 |
| Winners | 45 | 22 |
| %Winners | 43% | 34% |
Both Mccormick and Masur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tristan Mccormick conceded 1 set while Daniel Masur hasn’t conceded a set so far. Mccormick has played 1 set more than Masur (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mccormick played 16 games more than Masur. Tristan scored 45 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The German scored 22 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mccormick | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
| 1st in | 60/98 | 23/40 |
| %1st in | 61% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 22/23 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 96% |
| 2nd pts | 16/38 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 59% |
Mccormick bagged 8 aces . Masur bagged 5 aces . Mccormick won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 96% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mccormick | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 44% | 44% |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Mccormick surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Masur was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Mccormick | |||
| Q1 Castagnola | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 105-97 | 105-97 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 60/98 | 60/98 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/38 | 16/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Poling | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-41 | 64-41 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 23/40 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 22/23 | 22/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alfredo PerezPerez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – (2-1) – H2H and prediction