Jack Pinnington Jones and Christian Langmo will play each other in the semifinal of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 2 sets.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.23
Christian Langmo -> 3.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Christian Langmo
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Christian Langmo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
20 - 11win/loss
199
177
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240, Pinnington Jones got to the semifinal after beating Moerani Bouzige 6-1 6-4, Quinn Vandecasteele 6-3 6-3 and Aidan Kim 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, Pinnington Jones had a good straight sets win against Kim (6-4 6-4). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 76 points vs Kim’s 60. Pinnington Jones was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pinnington Jones bagged 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Jack Pinnington Jones was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jack broke Kim 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Pinnington Jones hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Pinnington Jones has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (100-56). 6-3 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Pinnington Jones has a compiled50-27 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Nottingham 3 Challenger where he overcame Kyle Edmund in the final 6-4 7-6(1).
The Brit has a composed 20-11 win-loss record in 2025, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
Christian Langmo
29 - 22win/loss
324
318
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-30 | 30-27 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-31 | 33-23 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 366, Langmo reached the semifinal after beating Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-4 3-6 6-3, Darwin Blanch 3-6 6-3 6-3 and Antoine Ghibaudo 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, Christian had a good straight sets win against Ghibaudo (6-4 6-4). During the match Langmo scored 72 points vs Ghibaudo’s 64. The American was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Langmo recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christian Langmo was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (29/36) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Ghibaudo twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Timaru.
The American has an aggregate 29-22 win-loss record in 2025, 24-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 75 |
| Pts | 210-162 | 259-232 |
| Total Points | 372 | 491 |
| Winners | 86 | 110 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Both Pinnington Jones and Langmo played 3 matches. At the moment, Christian Langmo dropped 2 sets while Jack Pinnington Jones hasn’t conceded a set so far. Pinnington Jones has played 2 set(s) less than Langmo (6 vs 8). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 20 games less than Langmo. The Brit scored 86 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Christian fired 110 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8.7 |
| 1st in | 112/191 | 142/234 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 86/112 | 110/142 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 40/79 | 52/92 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Pinnington Jones scored 12 aces (4 per match). Langmo struck 26 aces (8.7 per match). Pinnington Jones won 77% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 7/25 |
| % Converted | 42% | 28% |
| Conceded | 15 | 14 |
| Saved | 13 | 12 |
| % Saved | 87% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponents 10 times with a 42% conversion rate. Pinnington Jones lost his serve twice and he saved 87% of the break points that he conceded. Christian broke his opponents 7 times with a 28% conversion rate. Christian conceded his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | |||||
| R1 Bouzige | R2 Vandecasteele | 1/4 Kim | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 20 | 55 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 70-59 | 76-60 | 210-162 | |
| Total points | 107 | 129 | 136 | 372 | |
| Winners | 33 | 29 | 24 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 41% | 32% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 1 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 40/61 | 42/73 | 30/57 | 112/191 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 58% | 53% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 29/42 | 24/30 | 86/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 69% | 80% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 15/31 | 16/27 | 40/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 48% | 59% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/8 | 3/12 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 50% | 25% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 11 | 1 | 15 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 10/11 | 0/1 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 91% | 0% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Langmo | |||||
| R1 Pablo Ficovich | R2 Blanch | 1/4 Ghibaudo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 27 | 20 | 75 | |
| pts | 90-80 | 97-88 | 72-64 | 259-232 | |
| Total points | 170 | 185 | 136 | 491 | |
| Winners | 42 | 39 | 29 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 40% | 40% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 9 | 7 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 6 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 55/83 | 51/90 | 36/61 | 142/234 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 57% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 39/51 | 29/36 | 110/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | 81% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 21/39 | 14/25 | 52/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 54% | 56% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/10 | 2/8 | 7/25 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 30% | 25% | 28% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 | 3 | 14 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 6/7 | 3/3 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 86% | 100% | 87% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Rafael JodarJodar – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aidan KimKim (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick Harper/Johannus MondayHarper/Johannus Monday – Justin Boulais/James Kent TrotterBoulais/James Kent Trotter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aidan KimKim (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction