Murphy Cassone and Philip Sekulic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Murphy Cassone who should win in 3 sets.
Murphy Cassone -> 1.46
Philip Sekulic -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Murphy Cassone vs. Philip Sekulic
There is no head to head record between Murphy Cassone and Philip Sekulic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Murphy Cassone
32 - 23win/loss
211
172
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-31 | 17-14 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-18 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177, Cassone got to the 2nd round after beating Cooper Williams 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Murphy had a good straight sets win against Williams (6-1 6-2). During the match, Cassone scored 53 points vs Williams’s 30. Murphy was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cassone bagged 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Murphy Cassone was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 92% (22/24) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cassone was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Williams 4 times.
Cassone has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (97-65). 15-12 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cassone has a composed54-42 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger,the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger and the Lugano Challenger.
Cassone has a compiled 31-23 win-loss record in 2025, 15-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Murphy has never competed in this tournament before.
Philip Sekulic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 18-15 | 18-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-31 | 34-26 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 33-24 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-23 | 19-15 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 473, Philip reached the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Milavsky 7-6(2) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Sekulic had a good straight sets win against Milavsky (7-62 6-4). During the match Sekulic scored 85 points vs Milavsky’s 73. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Sekulic scored 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Philip Sekulic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Sekulic put 62% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (14/34) on the 2nd serve. Sekulic broke Milavsky 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Philip’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Bali.
Sekulic has a compiled 12-7 win-loss record in 2025, 12-7 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cassone | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 23 |
| Pts | 53-30 | 85-73 |
| Total Points | 83 | 158 |
| Winners | 22 | 38 |
| %Winners | 42% | 45% |
Both Cassone and Sekulic played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cassone and Sekulic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cassone played 8 games less than Sekulic. Murphy scored 22 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Sekulic scored 38 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cassone | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 24/43 | 55/89 |
| %1st in | 56% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 38/55 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 14/34 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 41% |
Cassone scored 10 aces . Sekulic blasted 3 aces . Cassone won 92% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Sekulic won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cassone | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 67% |
| Conceded | 1 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Cassone broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Cassone very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Philip broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Philip conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cassone | |||
| R1 Williams | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 53-30 | 53-30 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/43 | 24/43 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 22/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Sekulic | |||
| R1 Milavsky | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 85-73 | 85-73 | |
| Total points | 158 | 158 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 55/89 | 55/89 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/34 | 14/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction