Cezar Cretu and Emilien Demanet will square off in the 2nd round of the Targu Mures 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cezar Cretu who should win in 2 sets.
Cezar Cretu -> 1.363
Emilien Demanet -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cezar Cretu vs. Emilien Demanet
There is no head to head record between Cezar Cretu and Emilien Demanet since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Cezar Cretu
40 - 18win/loss
403
288
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 51-23 | 5-2 | 45-19 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 52-26 | 4-5 | 46-21 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-22 | 13-9 | 42-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 60-26 | 0-0 | 60-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-19 | 0-3 | 41-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 426, Cezar reached the 2nd round after beating Matei Varbanciu 6-3 6-2, Nikita Mashtakov 6-4 5-7 6-1 and Mihai Alexandru Coman 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Cezar had a good straight sets win against Alexandru Coman (6-3 6-2). During the match, Cretu scored 58 points vs Alexandru Coman’s 36. Cretu was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cretu blasted 2 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Cezar Cretu lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Cretu put 78% of his first serves in, winning 82% (32/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (4/11) on the 2nd serve. Cezar was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Alexandru Coman 4 times.
Cretu has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 69% of his matches (283-128). 33-14 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cretu has a composed244-102 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Romanian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Bistrita,M15 Targu Jiu,M15 Arad and M15 Bucharest.
Cretu has a composed 39-18 win-loss record in 2025, 33-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Targu Mures 1 Challenger
Cezar has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilien Demanet
31 - 22win/loss
594
515
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-29 | 10-12 | 26-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-28 | 17-12 | 13-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 580, Emilien got to the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Uta 6-1 6-3, Dragos Nicolae Cazacu 6-4 7-5 and Nicolas Alvarez Varona 6-3 3-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Alvarez Varona, Emilien had a free pass after Alvarez Varona retired on a 6-3 3-0 . scoreline.
Emilien’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Nova Gorica and M15 Eupen.
Demanet has a compiled 31-21 win-loss record in 2025, 26-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cretu | Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 50 |
| Pts | 214-167 | 191-144 |
| Total Points | 381 | 335 |
| Winners | 99 | 70 |
| %Winners | 46% | 37% |
Both Cretu and Demanet played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Cezar Cretu lost 1 set while Emilien Demanet hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Cretu and Demanet have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Cretu played 13 games more than Demanet. Cezar scored 99 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian made 70 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cretu | Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 138/190 | 98/155 |
| %1st in | 73% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 99/138 | 70/98 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 25/52 | 31/57 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 54% |
Cretu fired 5 aces (1.7 per match). Demanet bagged 4 aces (1.3 per match). Cretu won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Demanet won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cretu | Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 13 |
| Converted | 14/17 | 13/26 |
| % Converted | 82% | 50% |
| Conceded | 11 | 12 |
| Saved | 6 | 8 |
| % Saved | 55% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Cretu broke his opponents 14 times with a 82% conversion rate. Cretu conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 13 times with a 50% conversion rate. Emilien conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cretu | |||||
| Q1 Varbanciu | Q3 Mashtakov | R1 Alexandru | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 17 | 63 | |
| pts | 60-49 | 96-82 | 58-36 | 214-167 | |
| Total points | 109 | 178 | 94 | 381 | |
| Winners | 25 | 42 | 32 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% | 55% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 61/83 | 39/50 | 138/190 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 73% | 78% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 42/61 | 32/39 | 99/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 69% | 82% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 11/22 | 4/11 | 25/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 36% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/7 | 4/4 | 14/17 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 86% | 100% | 82% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2/5 | 2/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 40% | 67% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
| Demanet | |||||
| Q1 Uta | Q3 Nicolae | R1 Alvarez | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 12 | 50 | |
| pts | 67-40 | 81-77 | 43-27 | 191-144 | |
| Total points | 107 | 158 | 70 | 335 | |
| Winners | 21 | 30 | 19 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 37% | 44% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 26/38 | 48/83 | 24/34 | 98/155 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 58% | 71% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 30/48 | 19/24 | 70/98 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 63% | 79% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 19/35 | 4/10 | 31/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 54% | 40% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/7 | 4/6 | 13/26 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 57% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 1 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 7/9 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 78% | 0% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Targu Mures 1 Challenger
- Cezar CretuCretu – Mihai Alexandru ComanAlexandru Coman (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Dan Alexandru TomescuAlexandru Tomescu (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Imanol Lopez MorilloLopez Morillo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu Mihai PapoeMihai Papoe – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Miguel DamasDamas (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefan PalosiPalosi – Mathys ErhardErhard (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilien DemanetDemanet – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-3 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Dan MartinMartin (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Miguel DamasDamas (4-6 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan PalosiPalosi – Mathys ErhardErhard (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – Stefan PalosiPalosi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – Andrea PicchionePicchione (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu Mihai PapoeMihai Papoe – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction