Mitchell Krueger and Alfredo Perez will fight against each other in the 2^nd round of the Winston-Salem for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.34
Alfredo Perez -> 3.04

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Alfredo Perez

This will be the 2^nd time that Mitchell Krueger and Alfredo Perez play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Krueger (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they played each other, Krueger won 7-6(6) 6-2 in the 1^st round in the Fairfield Challenger back in 2023.

Mitchell Krueger

Ranked no. 248, Krueger reached the 2^nd round after defeating Tyler Zink 6-1 6-2.

In the 1^st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Zink (6-1 6-2). During the match, Krueger scored 55 points vs Zink’s 29. Mitchell was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.

Talking about the service games, Krueger made 9 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Mitchell Krueger was pretty efficient on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mitchell broke Zink 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).

Krueger has won exactly 50% of his matches (283-280) in the last 10 years. 9-14 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Krueger has a compiled 195-168 match record in the last years on hard.

Krueger’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Oeiras 5 Challenger.

Mitchell has a compiled 19-25 win-loss record in 2025, 9-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Salem Challenger

Krueger has never competed in this tournament before.

Alfredo Perez

Ranked no. 361, the American got to the 2^nd round after defeating Edward Winter 6-2 4-6 7-6(6).

In the 1^st round, Alfredo defeated Winter (6-2 4-6 7-6⁶). During the match Perez scored 108 points vs Winter’s 103. Perez was very aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Talking about serving, Perez struck 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Alfredo Perez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Perez put 63% of his first serves in, winning 71% (50/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (17/41) on the 2nd serve. Perez broke Winter 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).

The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Huamantla.

The American has an aggregate 40-19 win-loss record in 2025, 30-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Krueger	Perez
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	2	3
Tot Games	15	31
Pts	55-29	108-103
Total Points	84	211
Winners	21	50
%Winners	38%	46%

Both Krueger and Perez played 1 match. At the moment, Alfredo Perez lost 1 set while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set(s) less than Perez (2 vs 3). Therefore, Krueger played 16 games less than Perez. Mitchell scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 50 winners (46%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Krueger	Perez
Aces	9	2
Avg per match	9	2
1st in	25/34	70/111
%1st in	74%	63%
1st pts	21/25	50/70
%1st pts	84%	71%
2nd pts	7/9	17/41
%2nd pts	78%	41%

Krueger blasted 9 aces . Perez managed to score 2 aces . Krueger won 84% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Perez won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Krueger	Perez
Won	5	4
Converted	5/12	4/10
% Converted	42%	40%
Conceded	0	13
Saved	0	10
% Saved	0%	77%
Times Broken	0	3

Krueger broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Mitchell had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Alfredo broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Perez conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.

Krueger
	R1 Zink	Total
Score	6-1 6-2
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	15	15
pts	55-29	55-29
Total points	84	84
Winners	21	21
%Winners	38%	38%
SERVE
Aces	9	9
Double Faults	0	0
1st in	25/34	25/34
% 1st in	74%	74%
1st pts	21/25	21/25
% 1st pts	84%	84%
2nd pts	7/9	7/9
% 2nd pts	78%	78%
Breaks
Won	5	5
Converted	5/12	5/12
Converted %	42%	42%
Conceded	0	0
Saved	0/0	0
Saved %	–	0%
Times Broken	0	0

Perez
	R1 Winter	Total
Score	6-2 4-6 7-66
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	31	31
pts	108-103	108-103
Total points	211	211
Winners	50	50
%Winners	46%	46%
SERVE
Aces	2	2
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	70/111	70/111
% 1st in	63%	63%
1st pts	50/70	50/70
% 1st pts	71%	71%
2nd pts	17/41	17/41
% 2nd pts	41%	41%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/10	4/10
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	13	13
Saved	10/13	10
Saved %	77%	77%
Times Broken	3	3

Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger

• Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
• Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-6² 6-4) – See score progression
• Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-6³ 6-4) – See score progression
• Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
• Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-6⁶) – See score progression
• Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-7⁸ 6-3) – See score progression
• Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
• Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
• Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
• Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
• Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Alfredo PerezPerez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction